• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        34
        ·
        15 days ago

        They borrowed our real money from banks without us having any say in it, based on imaginary valuations of what someone would hypothetically spend for their mountain of shares based on the price the tiny slice for sale is worth…

        A complete and utter disregard for supply side economics.

        If any of them actually have to sell to pay back the loan, they go bankrupt and the bank can’t collect.

        That makes every other bank individually panic and call all their loans in to try and get what they can.

        Banks doing a run on banks. Then everyone’s going to try and pull their money out when banks starting going bust.

        • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          11
          ·
          15 days ago

          I’m just waiting for when they have to sell off all that depreciating silicone (SSD/HDD/RAM). Just hope they don’t throw it all in a landfill with the ET Atari carts out of spite.

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            Aquileo | link
            Aquileo | fedilink
            English
            Aquileo | arrow-up
            11
            Aquileo | arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            Nope, that shit will flood the market, but it’s all been run hot for as long as possible, well, the stuff that actually went into data centers. Some of the shit that’s been “sold” hasn’t been made yet, because the data centers are still being built, on land that’s still being stolen through eminent domain.

            Except, some of those data centers will be given over to government and corporate surveillance of, well, everyone. Surveillance that will then be used to enact violence on people. It already is.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Wanted to say that. They don’t have money and i’ll bet they never will have money, at least not anyone on the market today. In the future there might be hyperspecialized AI companies in market areas where they can raise the prices far enough to be cash flow positive on inference, but none of the current players will reach that point.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    23
    ·
    14 days ago

    I don’t think there is any wealth there, just undeserved trust that allows them to raise money through debt.

    If you seize that, then the debtors will come calling for higher risk premium and the venture implodes - sooner than they otherwise would.

    So maybe it is a good idea anyway.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      “5 more years, bro. I know I know, just 5 MORE years bro and we’ll have AGI on the moon bro, no idea how to monetize it but just 5 additional years bro!”

      How the heck does this keep generating cash flow? Are investors really this stupid?

  • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    21
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    14 days ago

    What wealth? The AI industry is probably the most debt-laden venture in the entire history of currency, and has failed spectacularly and repeatedly to demonstrate any viable path to profitability. There’s no wealth to take, and there never will be.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    13
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    They seize wealth from us

    Trump accounts are now mandatory for all children born after 1/1/25. They were briefly optional and you chose if you wanted them while filing taxes

    Trump accounts give the kid $1000 no strings attached and it’s loaded into an index (SPYM) made up of nvidia, apple, amazon, Microsoft, meta, tesla, micron, and alphabet class a (google).

    On a surface read this is great, trump is giving free money to children for education planning.

    But realistically it’s money laundering to fund their pump and dump. About 3.6-3.7 million children are born in the USA each year over the past few years (declining from a 2007 peak of 4.1). About 9% of those are undocumented, leaving about 3.25-3.3 million. This money isn’t free and doesn’t come from nowhere, it’s about 3.3 billion dollars of taxpayer money (yearly) to pump directly into AI companies and other grossly overvalued tech that’s propped up by making the overwhelming majority of retirement accounts contingent on its value (eg tesla)

    In a typical 529 you have much more say in how investments are spread (with notable limitations) but the trump account is spym only.

    Further, while 3.3 billion is barely anything in the scheme of the economy or even openais apparent (bloated) value, it’s to prime the pump to get more working class dollars in these companies. The 529 your child is given is essentially worthless if you make no contributions (at least in the context of education). Even maxing yearly contributions (5k/yr) from 0-18 with a prediction based on somewhat idealized returns would make the account worth ~$170,000 at 18, which is often not nearly enough to pay for college now, let alone in almost 2 decades. But it means a decent portion of Americans with children are pumping more of their cash into this bubble for their children’s education.

    This is not even touching on the other gross things, like robinhood being the default and only servicer of these plans, which almost certainly is because of a fat bribe as they are the scummiest brokerage that preys on wallstreetbets gambler type retail investors.

    Despite this it’s better than sending another 3 billion dollars of bombs for Israel to do genocide with, I guess

      • 7101334@lemmy.world
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 days ago

        Forgive the old internet phrase, but

        inb4 “It was never meant to. We’re a Republic, not a direct democracy.”

        A Republic implies that the elected officials endeavor to represent the will of the people. If you think that’s going on in America, you may need to schedule a trepanning procedure or something because some shit’s wrong with your brain.

        • cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          2
          Aquileo | arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Maybe electing people to have power over you isn’t really democracy? Like ever? Maybe democracy means you don’t need other people making decisions, but to work them the fuck out among yourselves?

          Or maybe that’s the exact opposite of democracy, and by not voting blue no matter who I’m the worst kind of fascist. Who can say?

        • Sarah Valentine (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Sure, but that’s like saying “communism definitely works, we just haven’t seen it done right yet” when it’s clear to outsiders that it’s meant to not work, in the exact way it’s not working, for the benefit of powerful elites as has been the purpose and product of nearly every human government to date. This whole “having a government” experiment is the longest running, most repeated, and frankly easiest scam mankind ever invented.

          • 7101334@lemmy.world
            Aquileo | link
            Aquileo | fedilink
            Aquileo | arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            …I don’t think you know what “inb4” means because I feel like we’re making the same argument in a lot of ways.

            but since we’re here anyway, I’m not an anarchist because a large, unorganized mass of well-intentioned people is easily wrecked by a smaller, organized mass of poorly-intentioned people. Creating an organized mass of well-intentioned people seems to be the ideal in that case. People are just flawed and we have to figure out how to work around that. We’re also still evolving (in this case, socially more than biologically, but that’s a really superior form of evolution in many cases). We’ve been living in societies of this scale for a very short period compared to our entire evolutionary history.

            I wouldn’t really describe myself as a communist either, I haven’t read enough THEORY for that lol, but I think it’s more likely to work than anarchism. And we’re obviously watching capitalism fail for literally all life on Earth so that’s a foregone conclusion.

              • 7101334@lemmy.world
                Aquileo | link
                Aquileo | fedilink
                Aquileo | arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                How do we organize millions-if-not-billions of people in a cooperative structure without having a system to it and recognizing that some people have skills that others do not? A really big, really lengthy conversation?

                • Sarah Valentine (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  Aquileo | link
                  Aquileo | fedilink
                  Aquileo | arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  All we have to do is follow the same fractal scale as everything else that built up to us. Particles form molecules, DNA forms chromosomes, cells form organisms, organisms form social groups. We don’t all mash our bodies together to make one large human organism do we? Then why do we feel the need to do the same with our naturally small social bodies? Those bodies should instead be treated as cells of a body another step up the scale, and so on as needed.

    • Artisian@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      See an extended version of this take from Bruce Schneier. (He’s also going to spend awhile arguing for a public option on AI; something using the technology in an open way, respecting IP, and distributing the benefits.)