• teft@piefed.social
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    4
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Personally i’d rather pay more for equipment than have these assholes tracking my viewing habits. But you could throw ddr4 in it. Should be fine for a simple HTPC.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      3
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t get the whole ram catagories. DDR3, DDR4, DDR5. They make it seem like the higher the number, the better the ram, but I always thought ram was just a space for computers to temporarily store information until it was ready to call on it.

      So from my perspective 16GB DDR3 should be the same as 16GB DDR5. But that’s clearly not the case.

      • teft@piefed.social
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        The biggest differences are speed and max amount of ram per module. For a htpc those shouldn’t matter much. I wouldn’t personally go to ddr3 unless I had some free sticks hanging out since the spec is about 20 years old now.

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          DDR3 is also pretty power hungry. Source: me, who built a homelab out of old DDR3 rackmount servers and can now no longer afford to run them.