Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:1705.10257 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 May 2017 (v1), last revised 7 Nov 2017 (this version, v2)]

Title:Boltzmann Exploration Done Right

Authors:Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Claudio Gentile, Gábor Lugosi, Gergely Neu
View a PDF of the paper titled Boltzmann Exploration Done Right, by Nicol\`o Cesa-Bianchi and Claudio Gentile and G\'abor Lugosi and Gergely Neu
View PDF
Abstract:Boltzmann exploration is a classic strategy for sequential decision-making under uncertainty, and is one of the most standard tools in Reinforcement Learning (RL). Despite its widespread use, there is virtually no theoretical understanding about the limitations or the actual benefits of this exploration scheme. Does it drive exploration in a meaningful way? Is it prone to misidentifying the optimal actions or spending too much time exploring the suboptimal ones? What is the right tuning for the learning rate? In this paper, we address several of these questions in the classic setup of stochastic multi-armed bandits. One of our main results is showing that the Boltzmann exploration strategy with any monotone learning-rate sequence will induce suboptimal behavior. As a remedy, we offer a simple non-monotone schedule that guarantees near-optimal performance, albeit only when given prior access to key problem parameters that are typically not available in practical situations (like the time horizon $T$ and the suboptimality gap $\Delta$). More importantly, we propose a novel variant that uses different learning rates for different arms, and achieves a distribution-dependent regret bound of order $\frac{K\log^2 T}{\Delta}$ and a distribution-independent bound of order $\sqrt{KT}\log K$ without requiring such prior knowledge. To demonstrate the flexibility of our technique, we also propose a variant that guarantees the same performance bounds even if the rewards are heavy-tailed.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1705.10257 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:1705.10257v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.10257
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Gergely Neu [view email] [via Gergely Neu as proxy]
[v1] Mon, 29 May 2017 15:33:29 UTC (29 KB)
[v2] Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:08:29 UTC (47 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Boltzmann Exploration Done Right, by Nicol\`o Cesa-Bianchi and Claudio Gentile and G\'abor Lugosi and Gergely Neu
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-05
Change to browse by:
cs
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi
Claudio Gentile
Gábor Lugosi
Gergely Neu
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences