You missed my point completely, and are arguing something I’m not actually saying.
You don’t help someone process an intense emotion by telling them their emotion isn’t helpful. That’s the whole point of the post.
You missed my point completely, and are arguing something I’m not actually saying.
You don’t help someone process an intense emotion by telling them their emotion isn’t helpful. That’s the whole point of the post.
Nah, this is bs.
Plenty of people are fueled by anger, motivated by anger, focus better when they’re angry. Anger can already be cold and calculated, no transformation necessary.
But aside from all that, emotions don’t have to be productive. They aren’t productive or unproductive, they simply are. Emotions are largely involuntary reactions to our surroundings and circumstances, a lense that colors an individual’s world. They’re all valid, regardless of whether or not they’re productive, and pointing out that “anger is not productive” makes you part of the problem the post is describing.


Social deduction games have never appealed to me and Among Us is possibly my least favorite iteration of any of them. I doubt people would even be talking about it if it didn’t hit big as a streamer game.


Most of the frontend apps let you browse things unauthenticated as far as I know. You can’t post/comment/vote without being signed up though, of course. You can also visit an instance’s url directly in the browser to look at things unauthenticated. So for your home instance, you’d just go to “https://lemmy.world/” in your browser. For my home instance, you’d go to “https://sh.itjust.works/” in a browser. Etc for the various other instances out there.
No it isn’t. I know cub gucci never replied to me. PsychadelicGoat is definitely the one strawmanning and insulting me.
Yet you’re the one that keeps doing the thing you say you aren’t doing. Hmmm
Eh, there’s plenty of hateful teachings in the Christian Bible too though
how do you know?
Because I’ve studied LLMs and the underlying concepts they’re based on.
It’s nothing more than surface level though. Their “knowledge” is limited to whatever is present in their training data, and any claims it makes outside of that are manufactured based on statistics and it’s knowledge of word order, not actual understanding of actual facts.
Just because it gets it right sometimes doesn’t mean it knows it’s right. Because, again, the only thing LLMs actually understand is word order.


So are you saying you’d be ok with your personal property being searched without a warrant on the suspicion that you might own child porn?


The Aztek may be ugly, but at least it’s functional and practical, at least for the purpose it’s built for.
They output responses that read like fact checks, and link things that are semantically similar to their output.
LLMs don’t understand concepts like “fact” and “source” though, so it’s a stretch to say they “do fact checks” and “provide online sources”.
Always remember, LLMs don’t actually understand anything other than what order words typically go in. They’re really good at it, sure, but don’t let that trick you into thinking they have any deeper understanding than that.


So much straight up misinformation in this thread lmao. My credit score was in the 790s-810s up until this year. I’ve never missed a credit card payment, I’ve always paid it off in full every month, and I’ve paid off every loan I’ve ever taken out early. I’ve only started carrying a bit of a balance this year as we work on home renovation projects, and my credit score has started dropping because of it.
Ok cool, but you’re doing it again


Do you honestly think a public office equates to a normal job in this context?
Does that make the Midwest the tiara that gem is set into?
Except that’s exactly what you did
During my computer engineering degree I was required to take enough math credits to earn a mathematics minor, and I learned the physics of transistors at a quantum level as part of the core curriculum. Do you think I can call myself an engineer, or should I limit it to just - what was the wording you used - oh yeah, syntax ape?