"No wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light."2 Corinthians 11:14The Internet and the news is alive with the YouTube audio/video "Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio"; the topic being Obama's "redistribution of the wealth" (see audio/video at the bottom).
Then, to augment this topic, in my Inbox was an Evan Coyne Maloney (producer/director of Indoctrinate U, the wildly popular expose of American academia) post which linked to a post by Robert Bluey (see second quote below), which had the following comment from "daveg" of Papa Golf Chronicles regarding an anecdotal method of explaining Barack Obama's Marxist approach to America's "wealth" (I love it) ...Play Monopoly. Wait until some of the kids start to amass a nice pile of money. As they collect rent, take 36% and distribute it to the kids that aren’t doing as well.
If you’re a parent, you know that screams of “That’s not fair!!” are guaranteed.
Use this opportunity to explain the Democratic (mis)definition of the word “fair.”Now for the email making the rounds (source unknown) which Dave G. commented on ...In a local restaurant my server had on a “Obama 08″ tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference–just imagine the coincidence.Here is the audio/video ... prepare to be left speechless ...
When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need–the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight.
I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I’ve decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.
At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient deserved money more.
I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered
Listen again to Karen (I believe she's a plant, probably one of Obama's law students), who mentions something called "reparative economic work." This is textbook Marxism. Have you ever heard the word "reparations" ("the making of amends for wrong or injury done: reparation for an injustice")?
If I hear between the lines, and I think I do, Obama is not interested in general redistribution of wealth, he is focused on specific and targeted redistribution ... namely to the black community, which, as Limbaugh has mentioned time and time again, has failed to rise up from the bottom like other minorities even though train loads of money have been given to them since the Democrats' "war on poverty." Money just does not work for some reason.
If you want to live in an America that mirrors the nations of the world who practice this kind of stuff (Cuba, Venezuela, China, Viet Nam, North Korea, etc.) vote for Obama; if you don't, then don't vote for Obama.
Mark my words (ala Joe the Dissembler), if Obama is elected he will try to make this generation pay for the sins of our fathers through reparations, but it will not work. The disease that afflicts this segment of our society is self-inflicted and will continue unabated. Perhaps it's time to see the victimization of blacks for what it really is!
Showing posts with label Wealth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wealth. Show all posts
Monday, October 27, 2008
WEALTH: America! Get used to your money no longer being "your" money!
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION: American voters will not understand this!
Obama's 95% Illusion: It depends on what the meaning of 'tax cut' is | WSJ Online
HT - Cutting taxes for 95% of Americans | Betsy's Page
HT - Election links - Maggie's Farm
More wealth redistribution coming with a BO win ... 56% of all tax filers would support most of the other 44%! See here too!
All taxes are wealth redistribution by their very nature; money we send to any government entity is a tax, no matter what they call it!This is classic socialism (aka Communism of the 30s to 60s before the poison was relabeled); it will, like all entitlement programs, be a disincentive to honest work.Here's the political catch. All but the clean car credit would be "refundable," which is Washington-speak for the fact that you can receive these checks even if you have no income-tax liability. In other words, they are an income transfer -- a federal check -- from taxpayers to nontaxpayers.
Once upon a time we called this "welfare," or in George McGovern's 1972 campaign a "Demogrant." Mr. Obama's genius is to call it a tax cut. [...]
Because Mr. Obama's tax credits are phased out as incomes rise, they impose a huge "marginal" tax rate increase on low-income workers. [...]
The tax credits are sold in the name of "making work pay," but in practice they can be a disincentive to working harder, especially if you're a lower-income couple getting raises of $1,000 or $2,000 a year. [WSJ]
Monday, October 13, 2008
OBAMA: Anyone told Democrats "wealth" doesn't belong to the government?
There you go again Barry! Just like taxing those who make more than $250k reveals where you think the American dream should end, here you lay claim to "wealth" ... which I assume you define as other people's money!
What the heck, who says he can't steal from those who work to give to those who don't? He's the president isn't he?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
runat>
