That’s shifting the goal post to cost, and not answering my question. Humans domesticated chickens long before factory farming existed. Animals breed of their own volition. There ARE farms that are only end-of-life slaughter. Do not force their animals to breed, provide excellent lives, etc. Who cares if it’s inefficient? That wasn’t the question. I’m going to ask the same question again. Are you universally against ALL animal products on principle, or would you be okay with goats cheese, as an example, if you could be certain it had a phenomenal life?
- 12 Posts
- 74 Comments
And once again, this is an argument against factory farming and inhumane practices, not farming and domestication in general.
Yes, I agree that factory farming is horrific. Yes, I agree that people should eat less meat. Yes, I agree people need to be more aware of where their products come from.
However, just because you neighbor beats his dog doesn’t mean everyone does.
And I repeat the same question I ask every time. Are you universally against ALL forms of animal domestication and husbandry? Eg. A small hobby farm that keeps a few chickens for eggs, and a few goats for milk.
That’s an argument for vegetarianism, not veganism. What about wool, honey, milk, eggs. And different countries have different mechanisms. Using the USA as a basis, is admittedly a bad example.
Here in Germany, there are very strict regulations on how living conditions can be claimed, ranging from 1(literal torture) to 5(outdoor access, pasture raised etc.) I’m not saying it’s a perfect system, but I can’t agree that it’s impossible and pointless to try when there are places actively trying and actively supporting l.
Actually, counter-intuitively, strict veganism would objectively increase animal suffering if authentic alternatives exist. Which they do. But they are admittedly not easy to find. Ethical farms do exist, and typically self-regulate and self-support by selling the products the animals produce. Wool clothes, free-range eggs, end-of-life meat, excess milk & honey, etc. If your only 2 options are torture products, or nothing, then yes I 100% agree that veganism would be the correct choice. Between these 3 options though, giving your money to an ethical farmer objectively increases the livelihood of the animals under its care, more so than complete avoidance.
You didn’t answer my question. Would you/do you support the ethical and mutually beneficial raising of animals? Chickens for eggs, milk for dairy animals. No abuse, good healthcare, no premature slaughter, etc.?
Edit. I just realized I’m not responding to the same person. But the deflection still stands.
You realize putting googly eyes on a toaster doesn’t give it feelings, right?
Assigning human values and desires to non-humans is not a coherent philosophy or ethical position.
Animals “Exploit” each other throughout the animal kingdom. Ants Literally farm aphids by protecting and herding them in exchange for what they produce. How is this wildly different from keeping a cow or a goat for milk?
Is the cow version evil because we’re humans, but the ant version okay because they aren’t?
Because that’s just making rules based on your desired outcome, not reason.
Then as a vegan you would support raising chickens, pigs, and goats on a small hobby farm where the animals are extremely well cared for and happy?
What you want to be normal and what is actually normal are not the same thing. Regardless of best wishes, it actually is normal in a shocking number of places. Unless you’re referring exclusively to the small social circle you live in, but that’s not really a useful data point for us to discuss, because it’s not what the conversation is actually about.
Hey peeps, I’m pretty sure they’re reacting to the SECOND “normal” statement, not the first.
Fawkes@lemmy.zipto
Political Memes@lemmy.world•Can't trust them to tell the truth anymore
2·19 days agoI think that’s on purpose. When people recognize ICE is just as likely to murder them as arrest them, then they’ll start fighting back.
Once people start fighting back, the administration can use that as justification to declare things like insurgencies and national emergencies.
Also, their propaganda works a lot better on morons when they can show their noble and loyal
gestapopedophile protectorspolice being attacked bypeople defending themselves against tyrantsevil bad people.
Fawkes@lemmy.zipto
TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•It do be like that
2·24 days agoI did actually watch the first and second season, and just never really enjoyed it.
And fair, I wasn’t trying to compare them directly, more pointing out that Star Trek has many episodes that have little to nothing to do with social commentary. And it seemed like that was the ONLY concept being explored in Orville, with sci-fi as a backdrop for funsies.
Fawkes@lemmy.zipto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do You Disregard People IRL who You Know ask AI everything?
11·24 days agoSo your entire complaint is based on vibes and feelings. Got it 👍
Fawkes@lemmy.zipto
TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•It do be like that
2·25 days agoI didn’t really like the Orville. Or rather, I wanted to like it, but found myself getting bored with it extremely fast. Every single episode is a new social commentary, without exception.
Obviously, Star Trek has a TONNE of social commentary, so that itself is not the problem. The problem I had, is that Star Trek also has sci-fi mysteries, silly episodes, philosophical questions, etc. I found Orville was just social commentary after social commentary without any of the additional flavours.
My all time favourite episode is Measure of a Man, which of course is a social commentary, but it’s more of a philosophical question of what we consider sentients and “life” to be. Even with Zero, I think his name was? I didn’t get those same vibes.
Fawkes@lemmy.zipto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do You Disregard People IRL who You Know ask AI everything?
12·25 days agoThey’re both computers that can be used in helpful and harmful ways. Can you deliminate how exactly they are different, beyond scope?
Fawkes@lemmy.zipto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do You Disregard People IRL who You Know ask AI everything?
213·25 days agoYes, but that means they’re using the tool incorrect. I can attempt to jam a wrench on the end of a soldering iron and use it to make a circuit board, that doesn’t mean I’m using the tool wrong, and should be justifiably mocked for doing so.
LLMs have their place. The fact they are being wildly abused and misused does not diminish that.
Fawkes@lemmy.zipto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do You Disregard People IRL who You Know ask AI everything?
213·25 days agoBetter be afraid of them new-fangled digital calculators too! Real calculations should be done by people. Having them performed by computers will make us dumber.
It’s a tool. It can be used right and wrong. Being afraid of the tool because it is being used wrong doesn’t make it go away, and doesn’t make it less useful.
And she was never heard from again 🥲
Why did you feel the need to make that comparison? Did anyone here mention supporting their actions? Is the strawman fighting back?
Wow… Badmouthing this person I’ve never met for things they actually did? I’m starting 15 instances just so I can ban you from all of them. Would you mind giving me your wife’s account so I can ban her too? Or making one if she doesn’t already have one? Appreciate it, and fuck you ♥️















Sure, but the logic reveals literally nothing. I can create an entire Sims world for the sole reason to see if the “turn pink clothing in to green clothing” mod works. Does the fact that their existence had a reason actually mean a damn thing?