It depends on which AI model you’re using. If it’s an older one, it’s not recommended.

If it’s a recently released model, then it’s probably acceptable. However, don’t use it for highly critical tasks unless you have a backup or two. Of course, you could also verify the code’s integrity as an extra safety measure.

What license do you want to use?

is the public domain or creative commons.

I feel like this won’t last long (maybe 10 or 15 years), because they’ll end up prioritizing seniors.

Why would a politician prioritize artists when the majority of voters are seniors who want their pensions?

While Brave rises, Firefox falls

How long do you think it will take before Nintendo and SpaceX decide to sue OpenAI over this video?

I read Nate’s article and Ryan’s article to compare.

Well, the truth is, I partially agree with Nate, because social media is about sharing points of view, which most of the time won’t coincide. Although on some occasions they will, like this time the NRA opposed banning gun sales to trans people.

There may be good people who are right-wing or left-wing, but there will be many who aren’t, and unfortunately, these are the ones who leave a bad taste in people’s mouths, making them think they’re all like that.

Also, the fact that most of the most-liked posts on Bluesky are erotic content makes it vulnerable, in my opinion, and I feel it should be reinforced.

Okay, but if he manages to win a Palme d’Or and an Oscar, I’ll blame the organizers of both awards.

What you say is partly correct.

Most of the cost of a medicine is research, so when new patented medicines come to market, they are usually very expensive because they have to generate profits.

Then, when the patents expire, generic drugs become available, which are very cheap because they are cheap to produce.

I feel like Jay Graber is following in the footsteps of a tech company CEO.

Because official data shows a decline in activity and active users

I thought it was my browser crashing.

Well, the user is giving his point of view on this event. Because it’s not the first time that there have been protests in front of a big tech company, for example, this VOA News video from 6 months ago talking about a protest, and I really don’t know what happened next.

And that prevents Israel from using open source and/or free software for its questionable activities or worse, go to Palantir to hire their services, because the protests only end up helping Israel so that it can change its services.

The user considers that it is more effective not to pay taxes as a form of protest, but the other option would be to protest against Netanyahu. For using the war in Gaza to prevent elections because they are technically at “war” and remain in power.

Those profits are already destined for the BBB.

That is until companies move on to supporting other operating systems like FreeBSD or RedoxOS and leave Linux to its fate.

The Smithsonian has to follow orders, even if they don’t want to because it would mean cutting their funding or ending up freezing it.

There should be an amendment that protects the Smithsonian from this without the risk of having its funds frozen.

I don’t know what bothers Elon more: someone criticizing him because another company does things that he himself does on his platform, someone from the company or organization he left, because he is gay, or all of the above.

Realistically, we learn these manual things by tradition and understand the basics. But in the working world that is automated and we only have to learn other things that are more important.

The Big Four accounting firms offer AI products.

Director of Open AI, Palantir, Mozilla or IBM?

It depends on how Intel is rescued: whether the government nationalizes it completely to become a state-owned company, partial rescue of the company to structure it, conventional rescue, or whether it is placed under federal guardianship for a time and then privatized.

In short, yes, but in certain scenarios.

Arguments in favor of rescuing Intel:

• It is a crucial sector; if a company goes bankrupt, it is difficult to recover for several years, because it is usually difficult for a new company if it does not have sufficient resources and/or support.
• If Intel declares bankruptcy, it would leave AMD with a monopoly on x64 because, without a direct rival to compete with, the price of CPUs is likely to increase and, as a result, the price of PCs would also increase.
• By rescuing Intel, the company can better plan its strategies and make long-term plans without pressure from shareholders to make a profit.
• It would preserve many people’s jobs, keeping unemployment low and without affecting people’s finances.
• Continue to maintain technological sovereignty in the country without the risk of another foreign company buying Intel’s technology.

I wonder if the government will bail out Intel and if it will do so either by paying off its debts or if it will become government property for a while.