Skip to main content
Log in

Patient and provider-level factors associated with changes in utilization of treatments in response to evidence on ineffectiveness or harm

  • Research article
  • Published:
International Journal of Health Economics and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-quality health care not only includes timely access to effective new therapies but timely abandonment of therapies when they are found to be ineffective or unsafe. Little is known about changes in use of medications after they are shown to be ineffective or unsafe. In this study, we examine changes in use of two medications: fenofibrate, which was found to be ineffective when used with statins among patients with Type 2 diabetes (ACCORD lipid trial); and dronedarone, which was found to be unsafe in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (PALLAS trial). We examine the patient and provider characteristics associated with a decline in use of these medications. Using Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2008 to 2013, we identified two cohorts: patients with Type 2 diabetes using statins (7 million patient-quarters), and patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (83 thousand patient-quarters). We used interrupted time-series regression models to identify the patient- and provider-level characteristics associated with changes in medication use after new evidence emerged for each case. After new evidence of ineffectiveness emerged, fenofibrate use declined by 0.01 percentage points per quarter (95% CI − 0.02 to − 0.01) from a baseline of 6.9 percent of all diabetes patients receiving fenofibrate; dronedarone use declined by 0.13 percentage points per quarter (95% CI − 0.15 to − 0.10) from a baseline of 3.8 percent of permanent atrial fibrillation patients receiving dronedarone. For dronedarone, use declined more quickly among patients dually-enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid compared to Medicare-only patients (P < 0.001), among patients seen by male providers compared to female providers (P = 0.01), and among patients seen by cardiologists compared to primary care providers (P < 0.001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Spain)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2016). 2016 national healthcare quality and disparities report. Content last reviewed June 2018. Rockville, MD.

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.). Creation of new race-ethnicity codes and SES indicators for medicare beneficiaries—Chapter 3: Creating and validating an index of socioeconomic status. Publication # 08-0029-EF. https://archive.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/medicareindicators/medicareindicators3.html#sect3.3. Retrieved June 29, 2018.

  • Anderson, R. E., Ayanian, J. Z., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Michael McWilliams, J. (2014). Quality of care and racial disparities in medicare among potential ACOs. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29(9), 1296–1304.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, P. B., et al. (2004). Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(6), 575–584.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnato, A. E., et al. (2005). Hospital-level racial disparities in acute myocardial infarction treatment and outcomes. Medical Care, 43(4), 308–319.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bekelis, K., Skinner, J., Gottlieb, D., & Goodney, P. (2017). De-adoption and exnovation in the use of carotid revascularization: Retrospective cohort study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 359, j4695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, N. J., Progovac, A. M., Wang, Y., & Cook, B. L. (2017). A decline in depression treatment following FDA antidepressant warnings largely explains racial/ethnic disparities in prescription fills. Depression and Anxiety, 34(12), 1147–1156.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2019). Health insurance exchange 2019 quality rating system measure technical specifications. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityInitiativesGenInfo/Downloads/QRS-2019-Measure-Technical-Specifications.pdf.

  • Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse. (2019). Condition categories. https://www.ccwdata.org/web/guest/condition-categories.

  • Connolly, S. J., et al. (2011). Dronedarone in high-risk permanent atrial fibrillation for the PALLAS investigators*. New England Journal of Medicine, 365, 2268–2276.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. L., et al. (2019). Assessing provider and racial/ethnic variation in response to the FDA antidepressant box warning. Health Services Research, 54, 255–262.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, F. (2015). On the undiffusion of established practices. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175(5), 809.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DePetris, A. E., & Cook, B. L. (2013). Differences in diffusion of FDA antidepressant risk warnings across racial-ethnic groups. Psychiatric Services, 64(5), 466–471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eicheldinger, C., & Bonito, A. (2008). More accurate racial and ethnic codes for medicare administrative data. Health Care Financing Review, 29(3), 27–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. N., Elam, M. B., & Lovato, L. C. (2010). Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(17), 1563–1574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girotti, M. E., Shih, T., & Dimick, J. B. (2014). Racial disparities in readmissions and site of care for major surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 218(3), 423–430.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groeneveld, P. W., Laufer, S. B., & Garber, A. M. (2005). Technology diffusion, Hospital variation, and racial disparities among elderly Medicare beneficiaries 1989–2000. Medical Care, 43(4), 320–329.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higuera, L., & Carlin, C. (2017). A comparison of retrospective attribution rules. The American Journal of Managed Care, 23(6), e180–e185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D. H., David, G., & Hockenberry, J. (2017). Selective hearing: Physician-ownership and physicians’ response to new evidence. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 26(1), 152–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D. H., & Hockenberry, J. (2019). Physician age and the abandonment of episiotomy. Health Services Research, 54(3), 650–657.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D. H., & Shen, Y.-C. (2014). Trends in PCI volume after negative results from the COURAGE trial. Health Services Research, 49(1), 153–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jena, A. B., Olenski, A. R., & Blumenthal, D. M. (2016). Sex differences in physician salary in US Public Medical Schools. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(9), 1294.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jena, A. B., et al. (2015). Sex differences in academic rank in US Medical Schools in 2014. JAMA, 314(11), 1149.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Karaca-Mandic, P., Town, R. J., & Wilcock, A. (2016). The effect of physician and hospital market structure on medical technology diffusion. Health Services Research, 52(2), 579–598.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Khera, R., Vaughan-Sarrazin, M., Rosenthal, G. E., & Girotra, S. (2015). Racial disparities in outcomes after cardiac surgery: The role of hospital quality. Current Cardiology Reports, 17(5), 29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kontopantelis, E., et al. (2015). Regression based quasi-experimental approach when randomisation is not an option: Interrupted time series analysis. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 350, h2750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozhimannil, K. B., et al. (2017). Uptake and utilization of practice guidelines in hospitals in the United States: The case of routine episiotomy. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 43(1), 41–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, A., Adams, J. L., William Thomas, J., & McGlynn, E. A. (2010). The effect of different attribution rules on individual physician cost profiles. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152(10), 649.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, A. V., et al. (2014). Changes in geographic variation in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable ischemic heart disease after publication of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 7(1), 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niven, D. J., Mrklas, K. J., et al. (2015a). Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: A scoping review. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 255.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, D. J., Rubenfeld, G. D., Kramer, A. A., & Stelfox, H. T. (2015b). Effect of published scientific evidence on glycemic control in adult intensive care units. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175(5), 801.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penfold, R. B., & Zhang, F. (2013). Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements—ClinicalKey. Academic Pediatrics, 13(6), S38–S44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, H. H., et al. (2007). Care patterns in medicare and their implications for pay for performance. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(11), 1130–1139.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, V., et al. (2013). A decade of reversal: An analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 88(8), 790–798.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qato, D. M., Trivedi, A. N., Mor, V., & Dore, D. D. (2016). Disparities in discontinuing rosiglitazone following the 2007 FDA safety alert. Medical Care, 54(4), 406–413.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reschovsky, J. D., & O’Malley, A. S. (2008). Do primary care physicians treating minority patients report problems delivering high-quality care? Health Affairs, 27(3), w222–w231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, K. F., Patel, M. I., Ma, Y., & Schmidt, L. A. (2015). How do integrated health care systems address racial and ethnic disparities in colon cancer? Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 33(8), 854–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, B. M., Pearson, T., Zwanziger, J., & Mukamel, D. (2004). Explaining disparities in access to high-quality cardiac surgeons. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 78(1), 18–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, J., Weinstein, J. N., Sporer, S. M., & Wennberg, J. E. (2003). Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among medicare patients. New England Journal of Medicine, 349(14), 1350–1359.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stagg, V. (2006). CHARLSON: Stata module to calculate Charlson index of comorbidity. Statistical software components S456719, Boston College Department of Economics. Retrieved January 2018, from https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456719.html.

  • Tsai, T. C., John Orav, E., & Joynt, K. E. (2014). Disparities in surgical 30-day readmission rates for medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. Annals of Surgery, 259(6), 1086–1090.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tsugawa, Y., et al. (2018). Association between physician US News & World Report Medical School Ranking and patient outcomes and costs of care: Observational study. BMJ, 362, 3640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubel, P. A., & Asch, D. A. (2015). Creating value in health by understanding and overcoming resistance to de-innovation. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 34(2), 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. (2018). Rural–urban continuum codes—Data.Gov. Retrieved January 2018, from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/rural-urban-continuum-codes.

  • van Bodegom-Vos, L., Davidoff, F., & Marang-van de Mheen, P. J. (2017). Implementation and de-implementation: Two sides of the same coin? BMJ Quality & Safety, 26(6), 495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. K., Soumerai, S. B., Zhang, F., & Ross-Degnan, D. (2002). Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 27(4), 299–309.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallaert, J. B., et al. (2016). Physician specialty and variation in carotid revascularization technique selected for medicare patients. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 63(1), 89–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, J. N., et al. (2006). United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine, 31(23), 2707–2714.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research reported in this publication was supported a pilot Grant by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P01AG005842. We also acknowledge support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R56 HL130496) and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS025164). Laura Barrie Smith and Alexander Everhart and also acknowledge support from the AHRQ doctoral training program at the University of Minnesota (T32 HS000036). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This work was also supported in part by AHRQ’s Comparative Health System Performance Initiative under Grant # 1U19HS024075, which studies how health care delivery systems promote evidence-based practices and patient-centered outcomes research in delivering care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pinar Karaca-Mandic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

In the past 36 months, Dr. Shah has received research support through Mayo Clinic from the Food and Drug Administration to establish Yale-Mayo Clinic Center for Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI) program (U01FD005938), from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Innovation under the Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative (TCPI), from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS025402; R03HS025517), from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01HL131535), National Science Foundation, and from the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) to develop a Clinical Data Research Network (LHSNet). Support to Dr. Jena was provided by the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (1DP5OD017897). Dr. Jena reports receiving consulting fees unrelated to this work from Pfizer, Hill Rom Services, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Tesaro, Sanofi Aventis, Biogen, Precision Health Economics, and Analysis Group. Dr. Ross has received research support through Yale University from Johnson and Johnson to develop methods of clinical trial data sharing, from Medtronic, Inc. and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to develop methods for postmarket surveillance of medical devices (U01FD004585), from the Food and Drug Administration to establish Yale-Mayo Clinic Center for Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI) program (U01FD005938), from the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association to better understand medical technology evaluation, from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop and maintain performance measures that are used for public reporting (HHSM-500-2013-13018I), from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS022882), from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01HS025164), and from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation to establish the Good Pharma Scorecard at Bioethics International and to establish the Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT) at Yale. Dr. Herrin has recieved additional support for unrelated research from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Mayo Clinic. Mr. Everhart and Mr. Higuera are paid research fellows at Medtronic for unrelated Projects. Dr. Jeffery is supported by two Grants that funded this study (NIH/R56 HL130496 and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/R01 HS025164); by an American Cancer Society funded study on biosimilar drug uptake (131611-RSGI-17-154-01-CPHPS); by the CERSI (U01FD 05938) for a Project addressing unsafe prescribing of opioids subject to REMS; and by NHLBI for a Project on step-down of asthma biologics (R21HL 140287). She has additional unrelated funding from NCATS (UL1TR 02377) and NIDA (UG3DA047003). Dr. Karaca-Mandic serves as the Principal Investigator to Grants that funded this study (NIA/P01AG005842; NIH/R56 HL130496 and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/R01 HS025164). She is also the Principal Investigator to an American Cancer Society funded study on biosimilar drug uptake (131611-RSGI-17-154-01-CPHPS). In the past 36 months, she reports receiving consulting fees unrelated to this work from Tactile Medical and Precision Health Economics.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 41 kb) (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, L.B., Desai, N.R., Dowd, B. et al. Patient and provider-level factors associated with changes in utilization of treatments in response to evidence on ineffectiveness or harm. Int J Health Econ Manag. 20, 299–317 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-020-09282-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-020-09282-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Profiles

  1. Joseph S. Ross