The following corrections and other changes have been made
in the DLMF,
and are pending for the Handbook of Mathematical Functions.
The Editors thank the users who have contributed to the accuracy of
the DLMF Project by submitting reports of possible errors.
For confirmed errors, the Editors have made the corrections listed here.
Printable errata
.
Equation (5.9.20) was added.

In the denominator on the right-hand side we replaced
by
.
Also the constraints
,
were added.
Suggested by Hans Volkmer on 2025-09-26
Two sentences at the end of §36.15(iii) have been modified to include new references and provide further clarification.
In the numerator of the argument of the basic bilateral hypergeometric function
and in the numerator of the arguments of the basic hypergeometric
functions, we replaced
by
. We also added a missing factor
in the first term on the right-hand side.
In this update we replaced
by
.
In this way we can remove the constraints on
and
.
Text was added below (17.8.3) discussing higher-order tuple product identities.
In the first paragraph of this subsection,
was replaced with
.
In the second paragraph of this subsection,
was replaced with
.
Immediately below (26.7.8),
was replaced with
twice and the text “Lambert function” was replaced with the text “Lambert
-function”.
All references to Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2015) were updated to the 8th edition.
Just above (1.6.57) “clockwise” has been replaced with “anticlockwise”.
Suggested by Denys Bondar on 2024-04-10
On the right-hand side of the asymptotic expansion as
, the factor “
” was
replaced by “
”.
In the asymptotic expansion, as
, on the right-hand side,
we have removed an incorrect multiplicative factor of
.
Suggested by Tianye Liu on 2024-03-18

The constraint
was added.

The constraint
was added.

The constraint
was added.

The constraint
was added.

The constraint
was added.

The constraint which was originally given by
has been replaced with
.
Just above (1.17.21), “formal” has been replaced with “formal (
-periodic)”
(suggested by Scott Glancy on 2023-08-23).
Just above §17.6(i) a paragraph Analytic Continuation was inserted describing the analytic continuation of the formulas which follow.
Just above the paragraph Ramanujan’s
Summation,
a paragraph Analytic Continuation was inserted describing the
analytic continuation of the formulas which follow.
This release increments the minor version number and contains considerable additions of new material and clarifications. In 2016, on the advice of the senior associate editors, is was decided to expand Chapter 18 (Orthogonal Polynomials (OP)). This release is the result of that decision and it includes, among other new material, enlarged sections on associated OP’s, Pollaczek polynomials and physical applications. It was decided that much more information should be given in the section on general OP’s, and as a consequence Chapter 1 (Algebraic and Analytic Methods), also required a significant expansion. This especially included updated information on matrix analysis, measure theory, spectral analysis, and a new section on linear second order differential operators and eigenfunction expansions.
The changes to Chapter 18 include the addition of 28 new sections
and subsections. In particular, these are: §§18.2(vii)–18.2(xii),
§18.14(iv), §18.16(vii), §§18.28(ix)–18.28(xi),
§§18.30(iii)–18.30(viii) (Section 18.30), §18.33(vi),
§18.36(v), §18.36(vi), §§18.39(iii)–18.39(v),
§18.40(i), §18.40(ii) (Section 18.40), as well as many new
equations, new figures, namely Figures: 18.39.1, 18.39.2,
18.40.1, 18.40.2, and updates to the main text. The specific
updates to Chapter 18 include some results for general orthogonal polynomials
including quadratic transformations, uniqueness of orthogonality measure and
completeness, moments, continued fractions, and some special classes of
orthogonal polynomials. For some classical polynomials we give some positive
sums and discriminants. We have also incorporated material on continuous
-Jacobi
polynomials, and several new limit transitions. We have significantly expanded
the section on associated orthogonal polynomials, including expanded properties
of associated Laguerre, Hermite, Meixner–Pollaczek, and corecursive orthogonal
and numerator and denominator orthogonal polynomials. We now include Markov’s
Theorem. In regard to orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle, we now discuss
monic polynomials, Verblunsky’s Theorem, and Szegő’s theorem. We also
discuss non-classical Laguerre polynomials and give much more details and
examples on exceptional orthogonal polynomials. We have also completely
expanded our discussion on applications of orthogonal polynomials in the
physical sciences, and also methods of computation for orthogonal polynomials.
The changes in Chapter 1 include the addition of 15 new sections and subsections. In particular, these are: §1.2(v), §1.2(vi), §1.3(iv), §1.10(xi), §1.13(viii), §§1.18(i)–1.18(x) (Section 1.18), as well as many new equations and updates to the main text. The specific updates to Chapter 1 include the addition of an entirely new subsection §1.18 entitled “Linear Second Order Differential Operators and Eigenfunction Expansions” which is a survey of the formal spectral analysis of second order differential operators. The spectral theory of these operators, based on Sturm-Liouville and Liouville normal forms, distribution theory, is now discussed more completely, including linear algebra, matrices, matrices as linear operators, orthonormal expansions, Stieltjes integrals/measures, generating functions. This update also includes improvments for Chapters 5, 10, 17, 19 and 32.
Previously we used the notation
,
,
for
,
respectively.
Previously these equations were given as inequalities.
For square integrable functions the inequality
can be sharpened to
.

The constraint
was added.
The third alternatives, involving
, were included.

The left-hand sides were updated to include the definition of the Christoffel–Darboux kernel
.
These equations were updated to include the definition in terms of
where
.
We included the case
.
This equation was updated to include on the left-hand side, its definition
in terms of a product of two
functions.


We made
explicit,
as well as the limits in terms of
.
The presentation of these inequalities has been improved.
The equivalences in terms of
and
were added.
![\sum_{y=0}^{N}Q_{n}(q^{-y})Q_{m}(q^{-y})\genfrac{[}{]}{0.0pt}{}{N}{y}_{q}\frac%
{\left(\alpha q;q\right)_{y}\left(\beta q;q\right)_{N-y}}{\left(\alpha q\right%
)^{y}}=h_{n}\delta_{n,m},](.././errata/m142.png)
We changed the presentation of this equation. Previously the
was presented as
.
The
representation was added.
Previously we presented all the information of these formulas in one equation

The constraint of this equation was updated to include
.

The constraint of this equation was updated to include
.

The constraint which originally stated that “
” has been updated to be “
”.
This equation was updated to include the definition of Bessel polynomials in terms of Laguerre polynomials and the Whittaker confluent hypergeometric function.
This equation was updated to include definitions in terms of the modified spherical Bessel function of the second kind.
These equations which were previously given for Pollaczek polynomials of type 2 has been updated for Pollaczek polynomials of type 3.

This recurrence relation which was previously given for Pollaczek polynomials
of type 2 (the case
) has been updated for Pollaczek polynomials of type 3.
Previously we gave only the first identity
.

This equation was updated to include the value of the sum in terms of
the
function. Also the constraint was previously
,
.
Just above (19.7.3) the requirement that
was added.
Suggested by Alex Barnett on 2024-01-12
The right-hand side of these equation, which was originally written as a matrix determinant, was rewritten using the Wronskian determinant notation. Also, in each preceding sentence, the word ‘determinant’ was replaced with ‘Wronskian determinant’.
The following additions were made in Chapter 1:
New subsections, 1.2(v) Matrices, Vectors, Scalar Products, and Norms and 1.2(vi) Square Matrices, with Equations (1.2.27)–(1.2.77).
The title of this section was changed from “Determinants” to “Determinants, Linear Operators, and Spectral Expansions”. An extra paragraph just below (1.3.7). New subsection, 1.3(iv) Matrices as Linear Operators, with Equations (1.3.20), (1.3.21).
In Subsection 1.8(i), the title of the paragraph “Bessel’s Inequality” was changed to “Parseval’s Formula”. We give the relation between the real and the complex coefficients, and include more general versions of Parseval’s Formula, Equations (1.8.6_1), (1.8.6_2). The title of Subsection 1.8(iv) was changed from “Transformations” to “Poisson’s Summation Formula”, and we added an extra remark just below (1.8.14).
New subsection, 1.10(xi) Generating Functions, with Equations (1.10.26)–(1.10.29).
New subsection, 1.13(viii) Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions: Sturm-Liouville and Liouville forms, with Equations (1.13.26)–(1.13.31).
Another form of Parseval’s formula, (1.14.7_5).
We include several extra remarks and Equations (1.16.3_5), (1.16.9_5). New subsection, 1.16(ix) References for Section 1.16.
Two extra paragraphs in Subsection 1.17(ii) Integral Representations, with Equations (1.17.12_1), (1.17.12_2); Subsection 1.17(iv) Mathematical Definitions is almost completely rewritten.
An entire new section, 1.18 Linear Second Order Differential Operators and Eigenfunction Expansions, including new subsections, 1.18(i)–1.18(x), and several equations, (1.18.1)–(1.18.71).
Equation (5.2.9).
The following additions were made in Chapter 18:
In Subsection 18.2(i), Equation (18.2.1_5); the paragraph title “Orthogonality on Finite Point Sets” has been changed to “Orthogonality on Countable Sets”, and there are minor changes in the presentation of the final paragraph, including a new equation (18.2.4_5). The presentation of Subsection 18.2(iii) has changed, Equation (18.2.5_5) was added and an extra paragraph on standardizations has been included. The presentation of Subsection 18.2(iv) has changed and it has been expanded with two extra paragraphs and several new equations, (18.2.9_5), (18.2.11_1)–(18.2.11_9). Subsections 18.2(v) (with (18.2.12_5), (18.2.14)–(18.2.17)) and 18.2(vi) (with (18.2.17)–(18.2.20)) have been expanded. New subsections, 18.2(vii)–18.2(xii), with Equations (18.2.21)–(18.2.46),
A new introduction, minor changes in the presentation, and three new paragraphs.
Line numbers and two extra rows were added to Table 18.8.1.
Equation (18.15.4_5).
The title of Subsection 18.16(iii) was changed from “Ultraspherical and Legendre” to “Ultraspherical, Legendre and Chebyshev”. New subsection, 18.16(vii) Discriminants, with Equations (18.16.19)–(18.16.21).
Extra explanatory text at many places and seven extra integrals (18.17.16_5), (18.17.21_1)–(18.17.21_3), (18.17.28_5), (18.17.34_5), (18.17.41_5).
Extra explanatory text at several places and the title of Subsection 18.18(iv) was changed from “Connection Formulas” to “Connection and Inversion Formulas”.
A new introduction.
Equation (18.21.13).
Extra text at the start of this section and twenty seven extra formulas, (18.27.4_1), (18.27.4_2), (18.27.6_5), (18.27.9_5), (18.27.12_5), (18.27.14_1)–(18.27.14_6), (18.27.17_1)–(18.27.17_3), (18.27.20_5), (18.27.25), (18.27.26), (18.28.1_5).
Originally this section did not have subsections. The original seven formulas have now more explanatory text and are split over two subsections. New subsections 18.30(iii)–18.30(viii), with Equations (18.30.8)–(18.30.31).
This short section has been expanded, with Equation (18.32.2).
This section on Pollaczek polynomials has been significantly updated with much more explanations and as well to include the Pollaczek polynomials of type 3 which are the most general with three free parameters. The Pollaczek polynomials which were previously treated, namely those of type 1 and type 2 are special cases of the type 3 Pollaczek polynomials. In the first paragraph of this section an extensive description of the relations between the three types of Pollaczek polynomials is given which was lacking previously. Equations (18.35.0_5), (18.35.2_1)–(18.35.2_5), (18.35.4_5), (18.35.6_1)–(18.35.6_6), (18.35.10).
This section on miscellaneous polynomials has been expanded with new subsections, 18.36(v) on non-classical Laguerre polynomials and 18.36(vi) with examples of exceptional orthogonal polynomials, with Equations (18.36.1)–(18.36.10). In the titles of Subsections 18.36(ii) and 18.36(iii) we replaced “OP’s” by “Orthogonal Polynomials”.
The paragraphs of Subsection 18.38(i) have been re-ordered and one paragraph was added. The title of Subsection 18.38(ii) was changed from “Classical OP’s: Other Applications” to “Classical OP’s: Mathematical Developments and Applications”. Subsection 18.38(iii) has been expanded with seven new paragraphs, and Equations (18.38.4)–(18.38.11).
This section was completely rewritten. The previous 18.39(i) Quantum Mechanics has been replaced by Subsections 18.39(i) Quantum Mechanics and 18.39(ii) A 3D Separable Quantum System, the Hydrogen Atom, containing the same essential information; the original content of the subsection is reproduced below for reference. Subsection 18.39(ii) was moved to 18.39(v) Other Applications. New subsections, 18.39(iii) Non Classical Weight Functions of Utility in DVR Method in the Physical Sciences, 18.39(iv) Coulomb–Pollaczek Polynomials and J-Matrix Methods; Equations (18.39.7)–(18.39.48); and Figures 18.39.1, 18.39.2.
The original text of 18.39(i) Quantum Mechanics was:
“Classical OP’s appear when the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is solved by separation of variables. Consider, for example, the one-dimensional form of this equation for a particle of mass
with potential energy
:
errata.1![]()
where
is the reduced Planck’s constant. On substituting
, we obtain two ordinary differential equations, each of which involve the same constant
. The equation for
is
errata.2![]()
For a harmonic oscillator, the potential energy is given by
errata.3![]()
where
is the angular frequency. For (18.39.2) to have a nontrivial bounded solution in the interval
, the constant
(the total energy of the particle) must satisfy
errata.4.
The corresponding eigenfunctions are
errata.5![]()
where
, and
is the Hermite polynomial. For further details, see Seaborn (1991, p. 224) or Nikiforov and Uvarov (1988, pp. 71-72).
A second example is provided by the three-dimensional time-independent Schrödinger equation
errata.6![]()
when this is solved by separation of variables in spherical coordinates (§1.5(ii)). The eigenfunctions of one of the separated ordinary differential equations are Legendre polynomials. See Seaborn (1991, pp. 69-75).
For a third example, one in which the eigenfunctions are Laguerre polynomials, see Seaborn (1991, pp. 87-93) and Nikiforov and Uvarov (1988, pp. 76-80 and 320-323).”
The missing factor
was inserted on the right-hand side.
A sentence was added just below (1.4.15) indicating that
we assume that
for all
in some neighborhood of
with
.
Suggested by Svante Janson on 2023-08-21
For consistency we have replaced
by
.
This limit relation, which was previously accurate for
,
has been updated to be accurate for
.
The constraint originally given by
is not necessary and has been removed.
Equation (4.13.5_3) (suggested by Warren Smith on 2023-08-10).
The title of the paragraph which was previously “Andrews’ Terminating
-Analog of (17.7.8)”
has been changed to “Andrews’
-Analog of the Terminating Version of Watson’s
Sum (16.4.6)”.
The title of the paragraph which was previously “Andrews’ Terminating
-Analog”
has been changed to “Andrews’
-Analog of the Terminating Version of Whipple’s
Sum (16.4.7)”.
The constraint originally given by
is not necessary and has been removed.
The constraint originally given by
is not necessary and has been removed.
The entry for
,
,
which previously was
has been corrected to be
.
The previous result was correct only for
.
Also, the presentation of several of the other results in the middle
column for
have been simplfied.
Suggested by Alan Barnes on 2023-03-06

The constraint originally given by
has been corrected to be
.
DLMF now uses browser-native MathML rendering for mathematics, by default, in all browsers which support MathML. See About MathML for more details and for other options.

The constraint was updated to include “
”.
Suggested by Walter Gautschi on 2022-10-14
In previous versions of the DLMF, in §8.18(ii), the notation
was used for the scaled gamma function
.
Now in §8.18(ii), we adopt the notation which was introduced in Version 1.1.7 (October 15, 2022)
and correspondingly, Equation (8.18.13) has been removed. In place of Equation
(8.18.13), it is now mentioned to see (5.11.3).

The coefficient
was given explicitly.
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2022-06-22

The last term on the right-hand side
has been corrected to be
.
Reported by Abdulhafeez Abdulsalam on 2022-06-26
In the first line of the section, the constraint
was corrected to read
.
Reported by Charles Karney on 2022-09-18
In both equations, the second entry in the
has been corrected with an extra minus sign.
The sign has been corrected and the final term in the numerator
has been corrected to be
.
Suggested by Hans Volkmer on 2022-06-02
The sign has been corrected and the final term in the numerator
has been corrected to be
.
Suggested by Hans Volkmer on 2022-06-02
§4.13 has been enlarged. The Lambert
-function
is multi-valued and we use the notation
,
, for the
branches. The original two solutions are identified via
and
.
Other changes are the introduction of the Wright
-function and tree
-function in (4.13.1_2) and (4.13.1_3), simplification formulas
(4.13.3_1) and (4.13.3_2), explicit representation (4.13.4_1) for
, additional Maclaurin series (4.13.5_1) and
(4.13.5_2), an explicit expansion about the branch point at
in
(4.13.9_1), extending the number of terms in asymptotic expansions (4.13.10)
and (4.13.11), and including several integrals and integral representations for
Lambert
-functions in the end of the section.
An entire new Subsection 13.8(iv) “Large
and
”, was added.
Just below (31.11.5), we mention that we take
.
Just below (31.11.17),
has been replaced with
.
Over the preceding two months,
the subscript parameters of the Ferrers and Legendre functions,
and the Laguerre polynomial,
,
were incorrectly displayed as superscripts.
Reported by Roy Hughes on 2022-05-23
The constraint
was added.
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23
The constraint which originally read
“
,
” has been extended to be
“
if
;
if
”.
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23
The constraint which originally read
“
,
” has been extended to be
“
if
;
if
”.
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-09-14
The constraint which originally read
“
,
,
”
has been extended to be
“
,
if
;
,
if
”.
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-09-14
The constraint which originally read
“
if
;
if
” has been improved to be
“
if
;
,
if
”.
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23
The upper-index of the finite sum which originally was
, was replaced
with
since
.
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23
The upper-index of the finite sum which originally was
, was replaced
with
since
.
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23
Specific source citations and proof metadata are now given for all equations in Chapter 25 Zeta and Related Functions.
In the paragraph immediately below (25.10.4), it was originally stated that “more than one-third of all zeros in the critical strip lie on the critical line.” which referred to Levinson (1974). This sentence has been updated with “one-third” being replaced with “41%” now referring to Bui et al. (2011) (suggested by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23).
The constraints in
(14.5.3), (14.5.4) on
have been corrected to
exclude all negative integers since the Ferrers function of the second
kind is not defined for these values.
Reported by Hans Volkmer on 2021-06-02
Originally it was stated that these Fourier series converge
“…conditionally when
is real and
.”
It has been corrected to read “If
then
they converge, but, if
, they do not converge absolutely.”
Reported by Hans Volkmer on 2021-06-04
The factor
originally used in the denominator has been
corrected to be
.
Factors inside square roots on the right-hand sides of formulas (19.18.6), (19.20.10), (19.20.19), (19.21.7), (19.21.8), (19.21.10), (19.25.7), (19.25.10) and (19.25.11) were written as products to ensure the correct multivalued behavior.
Reported by Luc Maisonobe on 2021-06-07
The constraint
was added
to the first sentence of this section.
A paragraph was added just below (3.2.23)
treating the case of
-orthogonality.
The multi-product notation
in the
denominator of the right-hand side was used.
The text “greatest common divisor of
” was
replaced with “greatest common divisor of
”.
In §3.7(iii), the symbol
is
now being used in several places instead of
in order
to disambiguate symbols.
The integrand was corrected so that the absolute value does not include the
differential. Also an absolute value was introduced on the right-hand side to
ensure a non-negative value for
.
In the online version, the leading divided difference operators were previously omitted from these formulas, due to programming error.
Reported by Nico Temme on 2021-06-01
Originally the sign in front of
was
. The correct sign is
.

Originally the contour of integration written incorrectly as
,
has been corrected to be
.
Reported by Mark Dunster on 2021-03-22
Section: 15.9(v) Complete Elliptic Integrals.
Equations: (11.11.9_5), (11.11.13_5), Intermediate equality in (15.4.27)
which relates to
, (15.4.34),
(19.5.4_1), (19.5.4_2) and (19.5.4_3).
The asymptotic results were originally for
real valued and
.
However, these results are also valid for complex values of
. The maximum sectors of validity are
now specified.
Pochhammer symbol representations for the functions
and
were inserted.
The statements “If
and
are real” and “If
and
are not both real”
have been further clarified (suggested by Alan Barnes on 2021-03-26).
Pochhammer and
-Pochhammer symbols in several equations
now correctly link to their definitions.
Linkage of mathematical symbols to their definitions were corrected or improved.
Additional citations were added to Section 11.11.
The integrand has been corrected so that the absolute value does not include the differential.
Reported by Juan Luis Varona on 2021-02-08
The factor
has been corrected to be
.
The factor
has been corrected to be
.

The factor
has been
corrected to be
.
Reported by Jan Felipe van Diejen on 2021-02-10
This release increments the minor version number and contains considerable additions of new material and clarifications. These additions were facilitated by an extension of the scheme for reference numbers; with “_” introducing intermediate numbers. These enable insertions of new numbered objects between existing ones without affecting their permanent identifiers and URLs.
This subsection has been significantly updated. In particular, the following formulae have been corrected. Equation (19.25.35) has been replaced by
in which the left-hand side
has been replaced by
for some
,
and the right-hand side has been multiplied by
.
Equation (19.25.37) has been replaced by
in which the left-hand side
has been replaced by
and the right-hand side has been multiplied by
.
Equation (19.25.39) has been replaced by
in which the left-hand side
was replaced by
,
for some
and
.
Equation (19.25.40) has been replaced by
in which the left-hand side
has been replaced by
, and the right-hand side was
multiplied by
. For more details see §19.25(vi).
In the first sentence of this subsection, the constraint
has been replaced with
.
Sections: ¶Herglotz generating function (in §14.30(ii)), ¶Lerch Sum (in §16.4(ii)). Equations: (3.5.20_1), (3.5.20_2), (4.21.1_5) (suggested by Ted Ersek on 2018-08-14), (13.6.11_1), (13.6.11_2), (13.11.2), (13.11.3), (13.11.4), (14.30.11_5) (suggested by Anupam Garg on 2018-12-07), (14.30.13), (15.5.16_5), (17.6.4_5), (17.8.8), (17.9.3_5) (addition of previous three equations suggested by Slobodan Damjanović on 2019-10-17), (19.2.11_5) (suggested by Jan Mangaldan on 2019-08-26).
Clarifications regarding
-powers and asymptotics were added, along with extra citations.
The material for this subsection has been improved to be more explicit.
The integrand has been corrected so that the absolute value does not include the differential.
Reported by Tran Quoc Viet on 2020-08-11
The right-hand side has been corrected by
replacing the Legendre function
with the Ferrers function
.
There has been disagreement about the identification of the Chebyshev polynomials
of the third and fourth kinds, denoted
and
,
in published references. Originally, DLMF used the definitions given in
(Andrews et al., 1999, Remark 2.5.3). However, those definitions were the reverse of those
used by Mason and Handscomb (2003), Gautschi (2004) following
Mason (1993) and Gautschi (1992), as was noted in several
warnings added in Version 1.0.10 (August 7, 2015) of the DLMF. Since the latter definitions are more
widely established, the DLMF is now adopting the definitions of Mason and Handscomb (2003).
Essentially, what we previously denoted
is now written as
, and vice-versa.
The representation in terms of
was added to this equation.
Originally, a factor of
was missing from the terms containing
the
.
Reported by Fred Hucht on 2020-08-06

The representation in terms of
was added to this equation.
A sentence was added recommending §27.14(ii) for
properties of
.
These equations, originally added in Other Changes and Other Changes, respectively, have been assigned interpolated numbers.
The wording was changed to make the integration variable more apparent.
In many cases, the links from mathematical symbols to their definitions were corrected or improved. These links were also enhanced with ‘tooltip’ feedback, where supported by the user’s browser.
as
,
(
) real, we have added the constant term
and the order term
,
and hence
was replaced by
.
The largest known prime, which is a Mersenne prime, was updated from
(2009) to
(2018).
Originally had the constraint
. This constraint
was replaced with
;
for some
;
and
for all
.
Several biographies had their publications updated.
In regard to the definition of the spherical
harmonics
, the domain of the integer
originally written
as
has been replaced with the more general
.
Because of this change, in the sentence just below
(14.30.2), “tesseral for
and
sectorial for
” has been replaced with “tesseral for
and sectorial for
”. Furthermore, in
(14.30.4),
has been replaced with
.
Reported by Ching-Li Chai on 2019-10-05
Originally all the functions
,
,
and
in Equations (22.9.8), (22.9.9) and (22.9.10)
were written incorrectly with
. These functions have been corrected so that they are
written with
. In the sentence just below (22.9.10), the expression
has been corrected to read
.
Reported by Juan Miguel Nieto on 2019-11-07
A phrase was added, just below (1.9.1), which elaborates that
.
Poor spacing in math was corrected in several chapters.
In Equation (1.13.4), the determinant form of the two-argument Wronskian
was added as an equality. In ¶Wronskian (in §1.13(i)),
immediately below Equation (1.13.4), a sentence was added indicating
that in general the
-argument Wronskian is given by
,
where
. Immediately below Equation (1.13.4), a sentence was
added giving the definition of the
-argument Wronskian. It is explained just above
(1.13.5) that this equation is often referred to as Abel’s identity. Immediately
below Equation (1.13.5), a sentence was added explaining how it generalizes for
th-order differential equations. A reference to Ince (1926, §5.2) was added.
In ¶IEEE Standard (in §3.1(i)), the description was modified to reflect the most recent IEEE 754-2019 Floating-Point Arithmetic Standard IEEE (2019). In the new standard, single, double and quad floating-point precisions are replaced with new standard names of binary32, binary64 and binary128. Figure 3.1.1 has been expanded to include the binary128 floating-point memory positions and the caption has been updated using the terminology of the 2019 standard. A sentence at the end of Subsection 3.1(ii) has been added referring readers to the IEEE Standards for Interval Arithmetic IEEE (2015, 2018).
Suggested by Nicola Torracca.
Originally the matrix in
the argument of the Gaussian hypergeometric function of matrix argument
was written with round brackets. This matrix has been
rewritten with square brackets to be consistent with the rest of the DLMF.
A sentence and unnumbered equation
were added which indicate that care must be taken with the multivalued functions in (19.11.5). See (Cayley, 1961, pp. 103-106).
Suggested by Albert Groenenboom.
Just below (33.14.9), the constraint described in the text
“
when
,” was removed.
In Equation (33.14.13), the constraint
was added.
In the line immediately below (33.14.13), it was clarified
that
is
times a polynomial
in
, instead of simply a polynomial in
.
In Equation (33.14.14), a second equality was added which relates
to Laguerre polynomials.
A sentence was added immediately below (33.14.15) indicating that
the functions
,
, do not form a complete orthonormal system.
Originally, the second term on the right-hand side was missing.
The form of the equation where the second term is missing is
correct if the
is terminating. It is this
form which appeared in the first edition of Gasper and Rahman (1990).
The more general version which appears now is what is reproduced
in Gasper and Rahman (2004, (III.5)).
Reported by Roberto S. Costas-Santos on 2019-04-26
Originally, the factor of 2 was missing from the denominator of the argument of
the
function.
Reported by Blagoje Oblak on 2019-05-27
The Olver hypergeometric
function
, previously omitted from the left-hand sides to
make the formulas more concise, has been added. In Equations
(15.6.1)–(15.6.5), (15.6.7)–(15.6.9), the
constraint
has been added. In (15.6.6), the
constraint
has been added. In Section 15.6 Integral Representations,
the sentence immediately following (15.6.9), “These representations are
valid when
, except (15.6.6) which holds for
.”, has been removed.
Additional keywords are being added to formulas (an ongoing project);
these are visible in the associated ‘info boxes’ linked to the
icons to the right of each formula, and provide better search capabilities.
Previously the exponents of the associated Legendre differential equation
(14.2.2) at infinity were given incorrectly by
. These were replaced by
.
Reported by Hans Volkmer on 2019-01-30
In the line just below (18.15.4), it was previously
stated “is less than twice the first neglected term in absolute value.”
It now states “is less than twice the first neglected term in absolute value,
in which one has to take
.”
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2019-02-08
Previously this formula was expressed as an equality. Since this formula
expresses an asymptotic expansion, it has been corrected by using instead
an
relation.
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2019-01-29

Originally, the factor on the right-hand side was written as
, which was taken directly from
Watson (1944, p. 412, (13.46.5)), who uses a different normalization
for the associated Legendre function of the second kind
.
Watson’s
equals
in the DLMF.
Reported by Arun Ravishankar on 2018-10-22
In the final line of this subsection,
was replaced
by
twice, and the wording was changed from “or,
equivalently,
” to “or, specifically,
”.
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2018-04-09
The previous constraint
was removed, see Fields (1966, (3)).
A note about the multivalued
nature of the Kummer confluent hypergeometric function of the second kind
on the right-hand side of (7.18.10) was inserted.
the previous constraint
was removed.
A clarification regarding the correct constraints for Lerch’s transcendent
has
been added in the text immediately below. In particular, it is now stated that if
is not an integer
then
; if
is a positive integer then
; if
is
a non-positive integer then
can be any complex number.
The constraint
was added.
The entry for
to represent complex conjugation was removed
(see Version 1.0.19).
The vector at the origin, previously given as 0, has been clarified to read 0.
A software bug that had corrupted some figures, such as those in About Color Map, has been corrected.
Originally the factor in the denominator on the right-hand side
was written incorrectly as
.
This has been corrected to
.
Reported by Ian Thompson on 2018-05-17
Originally it was stated incorrectly that
was fixed.
This has been corrected to state that
is fixed.
Reported by Ian Thompson on 2018-05-17
Originally the factor in the denominator on the right-hand side
was written incorrectly as
.
This has been corrected to
.
Reported by Ian Thompson on 2018-05-17
The overloaded operator
is now more clearly
separated (and linked) to two distinct cases:
equivalence by definition (in §§1.4(ii), 1.4(v), 2.7(i), 2.10(iv),
3.1(i), 3.1(iv), 4.18,
9.18(ii), 9.18(vi), 9.18(vi), 18.2(iv),
20.2(iii), 20.7(vi), 23.20(ii), 25.10(i),
26.15, 31.17(i));
and modular equivalence (in §§24.10(i), 24.10(ii), 24.10(iii), 24.10(iv),
24.15(iii), 24.19(ii), 26.14(i), 26.21,
27.2(i), 27.8, 27.9, 27.11,
27.12, 27.14(v), 27.14(vi), 27.15,
27.16, 27.19).
The generalized hypergeometric function of matrix argument
,
was linked inadvertently as its single variable counterpart
.
Furthermore, the Jacobi function of matrix argument
, and
the Laguerre function of matrix argument
,
were also linked inadvertently (and incorrectly) in terms of the single
variable counterparts given by
, and
. In order to resolve these
inconsistencies, these functions now link correctly to their respective
definitions.
The table of extrema for the Euler gamma function
had several
entries in the
column that were wrong in the last 2 or 3 digits. These have been corrected
and 10 extra decimal places have been included.
| 0 | 1.46163 21449 68362 34126 | 0.88560 31944 10888 70028 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | −0.50408 30082 64455 40926 | −3.54464 36111 55005 08912 |
| 2 | −1.57349 84731 62390 45878 | 2.30240 72583 39680 13582 |
| 3 | −2.61072 08684 44144 65000 | −0.88813 63584 01241 92010 |
| 4 | −3.63529 33664 36901 09784 | 0.24512 75398 34366 25044 |
| 5 | −4.65323 77617 43142 44171 | −0.05277 96395 87319 40076 |
| 6 | −5.66716 24415 56885 53585 | 0.00932 45944 82614 85052 |
| 7 | −6.67841 82130 73426 74283 | −0.00139 73966 08949 76730 |
| 8 | −7.68778 83250 31626 03744 | 0.00018 18784 44909 40419 |
| 9 | −8.69576 41638 16401 26649 | −0.00002 09252 90446 52667 |
| 10 | −9.70267 25400 01863 73608 | 0.00000 21574 16104 52285 |
Reported 2018-02-17 by David Smith.
The factor on the right-hand side
containing
has been been replaced with
to clarify the meaning.
Confluent hypergeometric functions were incorrectly linked to the definitions of the Kummer confluent hypergeometric and parabolic cylinder functions. However, to the eye, the functions appeared correct. The links were corrected.
It was clarified that
.
The original constraint,
,
was replaced with
,
.
It therefore follows from Equation (19.16.10) that
.
The last sentence of Subsection 19.16(ii) was elaborated to
mention that generalizations may also be found in Carlson (1977b).
Suggested by Bastien Roucariès.
The Weierstrass lattice roots
were linked inadvertently as the base of the natural logarithm.
In order to resolve this inconsistency, the lattice roots
, and lattice invariants
,
, now link to their respective
definitions (see §§23.2(i), 23.3(i)).
Reported by Felix Ospald.
The Weierstrass zeta function was incorrectly linked to the definition of the Riemann zeta function. However, to the eye, the function appeared correct. The link was corrected.
The term originally written as
was
rewritten as
to be consistent with other equations in the same
subsection.
The descriptions for the paths of integration of the Mellin-Barnes integrals
(8.6.10)–(8.6.12) have been updated.
The description for (8.6.11) now states that the path of integration
is to the right of all poles. Previously it stated incorrectly that the path of
integration had to separate the poles of the gamma function from the pole at
.
The paths of integration for (8.6.10) and (8.6.12) have been
clarified. In the case of (8.6.10), it separates the poles of the gamma
function from the pole at
for
. In the case of
(8.6.12), it separates the poles of the gamma function from the poles
at
.
Reported 2017-07-10 by Kurt Fischer.
In §10.37, it was originally stated incorrectly
that (10.37.1) holds for
.
The claim has been updated to
.
Reported 2017-11-14 by Gergő Nemes.
Originally the first argument to the big
-Jacobi polynomial on the right-hand side
was written incorrectly as
.
Reported 2017-09-27 by Tom Koornwinder.
Originally the prefactor
on the right-hand side was missing.
Reported 2017-08-12 by Wolfgang Bauhardt.

Originally the first term was given incorrectly by
.
Reported 2017-12-04 by Gergő Nemes.
Three new identities for Pochhammer’s symbol (5.2.6)–(5.2.8) have been added at the end of this subsection.
Suggested by Tom Koornwinder.
Originally named as a complementary error function,
has been renamed as the Faddeeva (or Faddeyeva) function.
Suggested by Roberto Iacono.
Originally the function
was presented with argument given by a positive
integer
. It has now been clarified to be valid for argument given
by a positive real number
.
Bounds have been sharpened. The second paragraph now reads,
“The
th error term is bounded in magnitude
by the first neglected term multiplied by
where
for
(9.7.7) and
for (9.7.8), provided that
in the
first case and
in the second case.” Previously it read,
“In (9.7.7) and (9.7.8) the
th error term
is bounded in magnitude by the first neglected term multiplied by
where
for (9.7.7) and
for (9.7.8), provided that
in both cases.”
In Equation (9.7.16)
the bounds on the right-hand sides have been sharpened.
The factors
,
,
were originally given by
,
,
respectively.
Bounds have been sharpened. The first paragraph now reads,
“The
th error term in (9.7.5) and (9.7.6) is bounded in
magnitude by the first neglected term multiplied by
provided that
,
for (9.7.5) and
,
for (9.7.6).”
Previously it read, “When
the
th error term in (9.7.5) and
(9.7.6) is bounded in magnitude by the first neglected term multiplied by
Suggested by Tom Koornwinder.
These equations have been generalized to include the additional cases of
,
,
respectively.
The Kronecker delta symbols have been moved furthest to the right, as is common convention for orthogonality relations.
The titles have been changed to
,
, and
Addendum to
§14.5(ii):
,
,
respectively, in order to be more descriptive of their contents.
The second and the fourth lines containing
have both
been replaced with
to clarify the meaning.
The original constraint,
,
was removed because, as stated after (25.2.1),
is meromorphic with a simple pole at
, and therefore
is an entire function.
Suggested by John Harper.
The title was changed from Physical to Physical Applications.
The original
in front of the second summation was replaced by
to correct an error in Paris (2002b); for details see https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.00548.
Reported 2017-01-28 by Richard Paris.
Originally this equation was incorrect because of a minus sign in front of the right-hand side.
Reported 2017-04-10 by André Greiner-Petter.
The numerators of the leftmost fractions were corrected to read
and
instead of
and
,
respectively.
Reported 2017-06-26 by Jason Zhao.

Figure 20.3.1
,
,
.
The locations of the tick marks denoting 1.5 and 2 on the
-axis were corrected.
Reported 2017-05-22 by Paul Abbott.
Originally the
in front of the
was given incorrectly as
.
Reported 2017-02-02 by Daniel Karlsson.
Following a suggestion from James McTavish on 2017-04-06, the recurrence relation
was added to Equation (9.7.2).
The unnumbered equation

was added in the second paragraph. An equation number will be assigned in an expanded numbering scheme that is under current development. Additionally, the discussion following (15.2.6) was expanded.
Sentences were added specifying that some
equations in these subsections require special care under certain circumstances.
Also, (15.4.6) was expanded by adding the formula
.
Report by Louis Klauder on 2017-01-01.
A bibliographic citation was added.
There have been extensive changes in the notation used for the integral transforms defined in §1.14. These changes are applied throughout the DLMF. The following table summarizes the changes.
| Transform | New | Abbreviated | Old |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notation | Notation | Notation | |
| Fourier | |||
| Fourier Cosine | |||
| Fourier Sine | |||
| Laplace | |||
| Mellin | |||
| Hilbert | |||
| Stieltjes |
Previously, for the Fourier, Fourier cosine and Fourier sine transforms, either temporary local notations were used or the Fourier integrals were written out explicitly.
Several changes have been made to
An entire new Subsection 1.16(viii) Fourier Transforms of Special Distributions, was contributed by Roderick Wong.
The validity constraint
was added.
Additionally, specific source citations are now given in the metadata for all equations
in Chapter 9 Airy and Related Functions.
The relation between Clebsch-Gordan and
symbols was clarified, and
the sign of
was changed for readability.
The reference Condon and Shortley (1935) for the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients was replaced by
Edmonds (1974) and Rotenberg et al. (1959) and the references for
,
,
symbols were made more precise in §34.1.
The website’s icons and graphical decorations were upgraded to use SVG, and additional icons and mouse-cursors were employed to improve usability of the interactive figures.
Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval
was replaced by
and
replaced by
. All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.
![]() |
![]() |
| (a) Density plot. | (b) 3D plot. |
Figure 36.3.9: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function
.
![]() |
![]() |
| (a) Density plot. | (b) 3D plot. |
Figure 36.3.10: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function
.
![]() |
![]() |
| (a) Density plot. | (b) 3D plot. |
Figure 36.3.11: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function
.
![]() |
![]() |
| (a) Density plot. | (b) 3D plot. |
Figure 36.3.12: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function
.
Reported 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi.
The scaling error reported on 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi also applied to contour and density plots for the phase of the hyperbolic umbilic canonical integrals. Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval
was replaced by
and
replaced by
. All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.
![]() |
![]() |
| (a) Contour plot. | (b) Density plot. |
Figure 36.3.18: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral
.
![]() |
![]() |
| (a) Contour plot. | (b) Density plot. |
Figure 36.3.19: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral
.
![]() |
![]() |
| (a) Contour plot. | (b) Density plot. |
Figure 36.3.20: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral
.
![]() |
![]() |
| (a) Contour plot. | (b) Density plot. |
Figure 36.3.21: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral
.
Reported 2016-09-28.
A number of changes were made with regard to fractional integrals and derivatives.
In §1.15(vi) a reference to Miller and Ross (1993) was added,
the fractional integral operator of order
was more precisely identified as the
Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator of order
, and a paragraph was added below
(1.15.50) to generalize (1.15.47).
In §1.15(vii) the sentence defining the fractional derivative was clarified.
In §2.6(iii) the identification of the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator
was made consistent with §1.15(vi).
A sentence was added in §8.18(ii) to refer to Nemes and Olde Daalhuis (2016).
Originally §8.11(iii) was applicable for real variables
and
. It has been extended
to allow for complex variables
and
(and we have replaced
with
in the
subsection heading and in Equations (8.11.6) and (8.11.7)). Also, we
have added two paragraphs after (8.11.9) to replace the original paragraph that
appeared there.
Furthermore, the interval of validity of (8.11.6) was increased from
to the
sector
, and
the interval of validity of (8.11.7) was increased from
to the sector
,
.
A paragraph with reference to Nemes (2016) has been added in §8.11(v),
and the sector of validity for (8.11.12) was increased from
to
.
Two new Subsections 13.6(vii), 13.18(vi), both entitled
Coulomb Functions, were added to note the relationship of the
Kummer and Whittaker functions to various forms of the Coulomb functions.
A sentence was added in both §13.10(vi) and §13.23(v)
noting that certain generalized orthogonality can be expressed in terms of Kummer functions.
Four of the terms were rewritten for improved clarity.
In applying changes in Version 1.0.12 to (16.15.3), an editing error was made; it has been corrected.
Meta.Numerics (website) was added to the Software Index.
Originally all six integrands in these equations were incorrect because their numerators
contained the function
.
The correct function is
.
The new equations are:

Reported 2016-05-08 by Clemens Heuberger.

Reported 2016-06-27 by Gergő Nemes.

Reported 2016-06-27 by Gergő Nemes.
The symbol
is used for two purposes in the DLMF, in some cases for asymptotic equality
and in other cases for asymptotic expansion, but links to the appropriate definitions were not
provided. In this release changes have been made to provide these links.
A short paragraph dealing with asymptotic approximations that are expressed in terms of two or more Poincaré asymptotic expansions has been added below (2.1.16).
Because (2.11.4) is not an asymptotic expansion, the symbol
that was used originally is incorrect and has been replaced with
,
together with a slight change of wording.
Originally was expressed in term of asymptotic symbol
. As a consequence of the use of
the
order symbol on the right-hand side,
was replaced by
.
There were clarifications made in the conditions on the parameter
in
of those equations.
Originally used
to represent both
and
. This has been replaced by two equations
giving explicit definitions for the two envelope functions. Some slight changes in wording were needed
to make this clear to readers.
The title was changed from Transformations of Higher
Functions to
Further Transformations of
Functions.
A number of additions and changes have been made to the metadata to reflect new and changed references as well as to how some equations have been derived.
Bibliographic citations, clarifications, typographical corrections and added or modified sentences appear.
This figure was rescaled, with symmetry lines added, to make evident the symmetry due to the inverse relationship between the two functions.

Reported 2015-11-12 by James W. Pitman.
Originally the constraint,
, was written incorrectly as
.
Also, the equation was reformatted to display the constraints in the equation
instead of in the text.
Reported 2014-11-05 by Gergő Nemes.
Originally the constraint,
, was incorrectly written as,
.
Reported 2015-05-20 by Richard Paris.
Originally the third constraint
was incorrectly written as
.
Reported 2014-11-05 by Gergő Nemes.

Originally the sum
was written with an additional condition
on the summation, that
. This additional condition was incorrect
and has been removed.
Reported 2015-10-05 by Howard Cohl and Tanay Wakhare.
Originally the prefactor
and upper limit of integration
in these two equations were given incorrectly as
and
.
Reported 2015-05-20 by Ruslan Kabasayev
It was reported by Nico Temme on 2015-02-28 that the asymptotic formula for
is valid for ![]()
; originally it was
unnecessarily restricted to
.
A new paragraph with several new equations
and a new reference has been added at the end
to provide asymptotic expansions for
Kummer functions
and
as
in
and
and
fixed.
Because of the use of the
order symbol on the right-hand side,
the asymptotic expansion for the generalized Laguerre
polynomial
was rewritten as an equality.
The entire Section was replaced.
Bibliographic citations have been added or modified in §§2.4(v), 2.4(vi), 2.9(iii), 5.11(i), 5.11(ii), 5.17, 9.9(i), 10.22(v), 10.37, 11.6(iii), 11.9(iii), 12.9(i), 13.8(ii), 13.11, 14.15(i), 14.15(iii), 15.12(iii), 15.14, 16.11(ii), 16.13, 18.15(vi), 20.7(viii), 24.11, 24.16(i), 26.8(vii), 33.12(i), and 33.12(ii).
The first paragraph has been rewritten to correct reported errors. The new version is reproduced here.
Let ![]()
and
be real constants and
The roots of
are:
,
, and
, with
, when
.
,
, and
, with
, when
,
, and
.
,
, and
, with
, when
.
Note that in Case (a) all the roots are real, whereas in Cases (b) and (c) there is one real root and a conjugate pair of complex roots. See also §1.11(iii).
Reported 2014-10-31 by Masataka Urago.
The original equation taken from Schulten et al. (1979) was incorrect.
Reported 2015-03-20 by Walter Gautschi.
The original equation taken from Schulten et al. (1979) was incorrect.
Reported 2015-03-20 by Walter Gautschi.
Originally the factor
in the argument to the exponential was written incorrectly as
.
Reported 2014-09-27 by Gergő Nemes.
Originally the first term on the right-hand side of this equation was written
incorrectly as
.
Reported 2015-03-16 by Svante Janson.
The equality
has been added to the original equation to express an explicit connection
between the two standard solutions of Kummer’s equation.
Note also that the notation
has been changed to
.
Reported 2015-02-10 by Adri Olde Daalhuis.
The equality
has been added to the original equation to express an explicit connection
between the two standard solutions of Kummer’s equation.
Reported 2015-02-10 by Adri Olde Daalhuis.
The equality
has been added to the original equation to express an explicit connection
between the two standard solutions of Kummer’s equation.
Note also that the notation
has been introduced.
Reported 2015-02-10 by Adri Olde Daalhuis.
Originally this equation was written incorrectly as
.
Also, the equality
has been added.
Reported 2014-10-03 by Roderick Wong.
Originally the third
symbol in the summation was written incorrectly as

Reported 2015-01-19 by Yan-Rui Liu.
To increase the regions of validity
the logarithms of the gamma function that appears on their left-hand sides
have all been changed to
, where
is the general logarithm.
Originally
was used, where
is the principal branch of the logarithm. These changes were recommended
by Philippe Spindel on 2015-02-06.
A note was added after (22.20.5) to deal with cases when
computation of
becomes
numerically unstable near
.
The spelling of the name Delannoy was corrected in several places. Previously it was mispelled as Dellanoy.
For consistency of notation across all chapters, the notation for logarithm has been changed
to
from
throughout Chapter 27.
Bibliographic citations have been added or modified in §§2.4(vi), 3.8(v), 5.6(i), 5.10, 5.11(i), 5.11(ii), 5.18(ii), 7.21, 8.10, 10.21(ix), 10.45, 10.74(vi), 11.7(v), 13.7(iii), 14.17(iii), 14.20(ix), 14.28(ii), 14.32, 15.8(v), 15.13, 15.19(i), 16.6, 16.13, 17.6(ii), 17.7(iii), 18.1(iii), 18.3, 18.15(iv) and 18.24.
Originally the second occurrence of the function
was given incorrectly
as
.
Reported 2014-05-21 by Hanyou Chu.
Originally the term
was given incorrectly as
in this equation and in the line above.
Additionally, for improved clarity, the modulus
has been defined in the line above.
Reported 2014-05-02 by Svante Janson.
Two corrections have been made in this paragraph.
First, the correct range of the initial displacement
is
.
Previously it was
.
Second, the correct period of the oscillations is
.
Previously it was given incorrectly as
.
Reported 2014-05-02 by Svante Janson.
In the original equation the prefactor of the above 3j symbol read
.
It is now replaced by its correct value
.
Reported 2014-06-12 by James Zibin.
The Wronskian was generalized to include both associated Legendre and Ferrers functions.
A cross-reference has been added.
These equations were rewritten with the modulus (second argument) of the Jacobian elliptic function defined explicitly in the preceding line of text.
An addition was made to the Software Index to reflect a multiple precision (MP) package written in C++ which uses a variety of different MP interfaces. See Kormanyos (2011).
Originally the first argument to the function
was given incorrectly
as
. The correct argument is
.
Reported 2014-03-05 by Svante Janson.
Originally the first argument to the function
was given incorrectly
as
. The correct argument is
.
Reported 2014-03-05 by Svante Janson.
The correct headings for the second and third columns of this table are
and
, respectively. Previously these columns were mislabeled as
and
.
| 0.0 | 1.00000 00000 | 1.00000 00000 |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 0.93846 98072 | 0.93846 98072 |
| 1.0 | 0.76519 76866 | 0.76519 76865 |
| 2.0 | 0.22389 07791 | 0.22389 10326 |
| 5.0 |
|
|
| 10.0 |
|
|
Reported 2014-01-31 by Masataka Urago.
The correct corner coordinates for the 9-point square, given on the last line of this table, are
. Originally they were given incorrectly as
,
.
| Diagram | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ⋮ | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|
|||
Reported 2014-01-13 by Stanley Oleszczuk.
Originally the symbol
was missing after the second equal sign.
Reported 2012-09-27 by Dennis Heim.
and
Originally the factor
was missing from the second term on the
right sides of these equations. Additionally, the condition for the validity
of these equations has been weakened.
Reported 2013-07-01 by Volker Thürey.
Originally the term
was incorrectly stated as
.
Reported 2013-08-01 by Gergő Nemes and subsequently by Nick Jones on December 11, 2013.
Originally a minus sign was missing in the entries for
and
in the second column (headed
). The correct entries are
and
. Note: These entries appear online but not in the published print edition.
More specifically, Table 22.4.3 in the published print edition is restricted to the
three Jacobian elliptic functions
, whereas Table 22.4.3
covers all 12 Jacobian elliptic functions.
Reported 2014-02-28 by Svante Janson.
The entry for
at
has been corrected. The correct entry is
. Originally the terms
and
were given incorrectly as
and
.
Similarly, the entry for
at
has been corrected.
The correct entry is
. Originally the
terms
and
were given incorrectly as
and ![]()
Reported 2014-02-28 by Svante Janson.
Originally the term
was given incorrectly as
.
Reported 2014-02-28 by Svante Janson.
Originally the Stirling number
was given incorrectly
as 6327. The correct number is 63273.
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0 | −3 62880 | 10 26576 | −11 72700 | 7 23680 | −2 69325 | 63273 | −9450 | 870 | −45 | 1 |
Reported 2013-11-25 by Svante Janson.
Originally the first term on the right side of the equation for
was
. The correct factor is
.
Reported 2013-07-25 by Christopher Künstler.
Originally the sign in front of the second term in this equation was
.
The correct sign is
.
Reported 2013-10-31 by Henryk Witek.
Originally the factor
was missing in this equation.
Reported 2012-12-31 by Yu Lin.
These equations have been rewritten to improve the numerical computation of
.
A new Subsection Continued Fractions, has been added to cover computation of confluent hypergeometric functions by continued fractions.
A new Subsection Addendum to §14.5(ii)
,
, containing the values of Legendre and
Ferrers functions for degree
has been added.
A new Subsection Continued Fractions, has been added to cover computation of the Gauss hypergeometric functions by continued fractions.
Special cases of normalization of Jacobi polynomials for which the general formula is undefined have been stated explicitly in Table 18.3.1.
Cross-references have been added in §§1.2(i), 10.19(iii), 10.23(ii), 17.2(iii), 18.15(iii), 19.2(iv), 19.16(i).
Entries for the Sage computational system have been updated in the Software Index.
The default document format for DLMF is now HTML5 which includes MathML providing better accessibility and display of mathematics.
All interactive 3D graphics on the DLMF website have been recast using WebGL and X3DOM, improving portability and performance; WebGL it is now the default format.
Several minor improvements were made affecting display and layout; primarily tracking changes to the underlying LaTeXML system.
The condition for (1.2.2), (1.2.4),
and (1.2.5) was corrected. These equations are true
only if
is a positive integer.
Previously
was allowed to be zero.
Reported 2011-08-10 by Michael Somos.
The condition for the validity of (8.17.5)
is that
and
are positive integers and
.
Previously, no conditions were stated.
Reported 2011-03-23 by Stephen Bourn.
Originally this coefficient was given incorrectly as
.
The other coefficients in this equation have not been changed.
Reported 2012-05-11 by Antony Lee.
The condition for the validity of this equation is
.
Originally it was given incorrectly as
.
Originally it was stated, incorrectly, that
is real when
and
. This statement is true only for
and
.
Reported 2012-07-18 by Hans Volkmer and Howard Cohl.
Originally the vector
on the right-hand side
was given incorrectly as
.
Reported 2012-08-27 by Klaas Vantournhout.
The entire original content of this subsection has been replaced by a reference.
The captions for these figures have been corrected to read, in part,
“as a function of
”
(instead of
). Also, the resolution of the graph in
Figure 22.3.22 was improved near
.
Reported 2011-10-30 by Paul Abbott.
Originally the denominator
was given incorrectly as
.
Reported 2012-02-16 by James D. Walker.
This equation is true only for
. Previously,
was also allowed.
Reported 2012-05-14 by Vladimir Yurovsky.
Originally this equation was given incorrectly as
Reported 2011-09-05 by Suresh Govindarajan.
On August 24, 2012 Dr. Adri B. Olde Daalhuis was added as Mathematics Editor. This addition has been recorded at the end of the Preface.
Bibliographic citations were added in §§5.5(iii), 5.6(i), 5.10, 5.21, 7.13(ii), 10.19(iii), 10.21(i), 10.21(iv), 10.21(xiii), 10.21(xiv), 10.42, 10.46, 10.74(vii), 13.8(ii), 13.9(i), 13.9(ii), 13.11, 13.29(iv), 14.11, 15.13, 15.19(i), 17.18, 18.16(ii), 18.16(iv), 18.26(v), 19.12, 19.36(iv), 20.7(i), 20.7(ii), 20.7(iii), 20.7(vii), 25.11(iv), 25.18(i), 26.12(iv), 28.24, 28.34(ii), 29.20(i), 31.17(ii), 32.17, and as a general reference in Chapter 3.
A cross-reference was added.
The upper and lower bounds given have been replaced with stronger bounds.
Other minor changes were made in the bibliography and index.
Several minor improvements were made affecting display of math and graphics on the website; the software index and help files were updated.
Originally the left-hand side was given correctly as
;
the equation is true also for
.
Several minor improvements were made affecting display on the website; the help files were revised.
The formulas in these subsections are valid only for
.
No conditions on
were given originally.
Reported 2010-10-18 by Andreas Kurt Richter.
Originally the ordinate labels 2 and 4 in this figure were placed too high.

Reported 2010-11-08 by Wolfgang Ehrhardt.

Originally the argument to
in this equation was incorrect (
, rather than
), and the condition on
was too weak (
, rather than
).
Also, the factor multiplying
was rewritten to clarify the poles; originally it was
.
Reported 2010-11-02 by Alvaro Valenzuela.
Originally the differential was identified incorrectly as
; the correct
differential is
.
Reported 2011-04-08.
The coefficient
for
in the first row of this table originally omitted the parentheses
and was given as
, instead
of
.
| 0 | |||
| ⋮ | |||
Reported 2010-09-16 by Kendall Atkinson.
Originally it was implied that
is an elliptic integral.
It was clarified that
is an elliptic integral iff
the stated conditions hold; originally these conditions were stated as sufficient but not necessary. In particular,
does not satisfy these conditions.
Reported 2010-11-23.
Originally the limiting form for
in the last line of this table
was incorrect (
, instead of
).
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Reported 2010-11-23.
Originally this equation appeared with the upper limit of integration as
, rather than
.
Reported 2010-07-08 by Charles Karney.
Originally this equation appeared with
in the summation, instead of
.
Reported 2010-11-07 by Layne Watson.
Originally this equation appeared with
in the second term, rather than
.
Reported 2010-04-02.
The definition of the notation
was added in
Common Notations and Definitions.
The general references for each chapter were inserted under the i-symbol on the chapter title pages. Originally these appeared only in the References sections of the individual chapters in the Handbook.
The definition of
was revised in
Notations.
Additions and revisions were made in the Cross Index for Computing Special Functions.
The Handbook of Mathematical Functions was published, and the Digital Library of Mathematical Functions was released.