
If
and the upper signs are taken, then the restriction
on
is unnecessary.
Suggested 2012-12-28 by Alexander Barnett

The restriction
is unnecessary when
and
is an integer. Special cases are:

Define
the branches being continuous and chosen so that
and
as
. If
,
are real and positive and
, then
and
are real and nonnegative, and the geometrical relationship is
shown in Figure 10.23.1.


where
is Gegenbauer’s polynomial
(§18.3). The restriction
is
unnecessary in (10.23.7) when
and
is an integer, and in (10.23.8) when
.
The degenerate form of (10.23.8) when
is given by

See also §10.12.
For expansions of products of Bessel functions of the first kind in partial fractions see Rogers (2005).

where
is the distance of the nearest singularity of the analytic function
from
,

Reported 2021-03-22 by Mark Dunster
and
is Neumann’s polynomial, defined by the generating
function:

is a polynomial of degree
in
and

For the more general form of expansion
see Watson (1944, §16.13), and for further generalizations see Watson (1944, Chapter 16) and Erdélyi et al. (1953b, §7.10.1).

where
is Euler’s constant and
(§5.2).
Assume
satisfies
and define

where
is as in §10.21(i). If
, then
provided that
is of bounded variation (§1.4(v)) on an
interval
with
. This result is proved in
Watson (1944, Chapter 18) and further information is provided in
this reference, including the behavior of the series near
and
.
As an example,

(Note that when
the left-hand side is 1 and the right-hand side is 0.)