August 16, 2026
Matthew 15:21-28
I am a dog person. I had dachshunds growing up… three of them. But I haven’t had a dog in quite a few years. So, I was delighted when my girlfriend rescued a dog. Her dog’s name is Daisy and she’s a Maltese-Poodle mix. She’s about 8 years old and is one of the friendliest dogs I have ever met. When I take her for walks, which is fairly often, if she sees another person ANYWHERE, she is pulling on that leash with all of her might trying to go and see that person. It doesn’t matter if we know them or not, Daisy just always wants to make new friends. Daisy is also a foodie, which fits right in with my girlfriend’s family. If we put her dog food down before we sit down to have dinner, she will never touch it until after we eat, because while we are eating, Daisy will be sitting and begging at the table because, of course, she much prefers people food. If she is begging and she is ignored, she will occasionally woof at us to get our attention. You know, just to remind us that she is patiently waiting for whatever we may choose to give her or whatever may fall from the table. And yes, we both realize that we are not supposed to feed her from the table, but you know… she’s just so darn cute! Only after we have finished the meal and cleared the table will she finally go to her dish and eat her dog food. She’s a smart girl!
In first century Palestine, dogs did not have the same reputation that they have nowadays. There were packs of wild dogs who aggressively stole food from people at every opportunity and were generally a nuisance. But when Jesus uses the word “dog” in today’s lesson he doesn’t use the word that the ancients used to describe these troublesome wild dogs. He used a diminutive; a word that might better be translated as “puppy”. It was a word that was used to describe a beloved house pet.
Now, as we read today’s genuinely difficult passage, we realize that Jesus’ using the word “puppy” instead of “dog” really didn’t soften how insulting His statement was to this Canaanite woman. And frankly, His treatment of this woman is not at all what we have come to expect from Jesus. But we really need to look at this in its first century context. Saunders says, “Matthew reminds us here that God is first of all faithful to the promises made to Israel, which in turn is to bear witness to the nations of God’s faithfulness and redemptive power. At the end of the Gospel, when Jesus’ death and resurrection have brought the divine plan for Israel’s redemption to fruition, Jesus will extend the disciples’ mission to all the nations. But not yet. Here Jesus will not be swayed—at least not easily—from his appointed calling. Jesus’ response to the woman thus tells us more about the nature of his mission and his faithfulness to it than about his feelings toward women or Gentiles.” [1]
And so with that in mind, let’s dig into today’s story. Jesus has just finished having a confrontation with a delegation of priests and scribes from Jerusalem. And the previous chapter of Matthew had just told us that Jesus is in Gennesaret, which is about 75 miles from Jerusalem, so this delegation from Jerusalem has come quite a distance on foot to have this discussion with Jesus. The discussion didn’t go particularly well, and we will talk a bit more about that later, but the end result of the discussion is that Jesus did a pretty thorough job of offending this delegation of Jewish authorities.
Our story tells us that after this conversation Jesus withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. Scott Hoezee describes Tyre and Sidon saying, “To most of Matthew’s original readers that was the equivalent of saying that Jesus had now entered Paganland. He was outside of any recognizably religious area and had entered a kind of spiritual slum, a veritable ghetto of unbelief. This was the kind of place “good” folks did not visit. [2] Tyre and Sidon were also outside of the area governed by Herod and so, what Jesus was doing here was most likely avoiding further conflict with the Jewish and the Roman authorities because His time for a full confrontation with them had not yet come. .
As they enter Tyre and Sidon, a woman approaches Jesus loudly asking Him to heal her daughter, who was possessed by a demon. And this woman is a Gentile, but she is not just any Gentile. In Luke’s parallel account of this story Luke identifies her as being Syrophoenician but Matthew, writing primarily to Jewish Christians, identifies her as a Canaanite. Both of these descriptions are correct; Luke is describing where the woman is from but Matthew is identifying her bloodline. And this matters, because the Canaanites and the Israelites have been enemies for centuries and her being a Canaanite just presents another additional barrier to the relationship between the woman and Jesus.
And so now, contrary to pretty much everything that we would expect from Jesus, Jesus ignored her… completely. The disciples, annoyed by her loudness and her persistence, asked Jesus to send her away. The Greek text makes it clear that it was to the disciples, and not the woman, that Jesus said, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.” Whether the woman hears this or not, we don’t know. But regardless, it does not interfere with the persistence of her requests. And things are about to get worse.
This woman kneels before Jesus, adopting an attitude of worship and respect, and after calling Him the Son of David, she said, “Lord, help me!” In spite of the fact that this woman is a Gentile, she has identified Jesus first as the Son of David, recognizing Him as the Jewish Messiah, then, she called Him Lord. This woman clearly believes in Jesus’ authority and in His ability to heal her daughter. Unfortunately for her, this is still not enough, because Jesus replies to her, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”
I think it’s fair to say that Jesus’ treatment of this woman is puzzling to modern Christians, and in fact, commentators over the last few centuries have put forth many, and widely varying, explanations as to why Jesus responded to this woman in this way. And as much as I hate to admit it… I’m not going to be able to explain this for y’all either. This same Jesus who used a despised Samaritan as the example of the neighbor who we are called to love, has appeared to completely reject this Canaanite woman.
Now, to the first century reader of Matthew’s Gospel, this may not have raised many eyebrows. The Jewish practice of exclusivity… the dividing of people into clean and unclean, would have rendered Jesus’ response to this woman to be perfectly normal and reasonable. But, in this century, we expect more compassion from Jesus than what we are seeing here. However, in spite of my not being able to resolve the apparent dichotomy of how Jesus’ actions here just don’t fit with the loving and inclusive response that we would normally have expected from Him, I believe that Matthew included this story here, at this exact spot in his Gospel, for a very good reason.
You see, in that conversation that we spoke about earlier that Jesus had had with the Jewish authorities, Jesus was teaching a really important lesson about cleanliness and uncleanliness. The Jewish authorities began this discussion by asking Jesus why His disciples didn’t wash their hands before eating. And this question was not about hygiene. The word the Pharisees used was νίπτο (neep-toe) and this word doesn’t so much mean washing as it means anointing, νίπτο describes a ceremonial washing of the hands. Originally, the Bible commanded only priests to ceremonially wash their hands before meals, but the oral teaching of the Pharisees took this rule and applied it to every observant Jew.
Jesus responded to their question rather obliquely by taking issue with the common Jewish practice of Corban. This was a vow that one made to bequeath their wealth to God. But this was actually a really slick maneuver because you still had the use of your resources while you were alive, but you were prohibited from giving away any of it that you didn’t use yourself… most notably not giving to elderly parents who may have been relying on you for their care. Jesus points this out as a clear violation of the commandment to honor one’s father and mother; a commandment which, by the way, mandated financial support of elderly parents.
Jesus then summarizes this argument for His disciples by stating that “What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them.” The Pharisees were so concerned about the ceremonial washing but were neglecting the important things in life like seeing to the care of one’s parents in their old age. Allan Bevere says, “Jesus always emphasizes the need for something more than appearances. In the Sermon on the Mount, he states that anger is the root of murder, lust is the root of adultery and love extends to one’s enemies. God’s kingdom is not so much concerned with appearances and looking holy in practice, but with the person’s inner life from which the actions emerge.” [3]
Our Canaanite friend answered Jesus’ comment about not giving the children’s food to the dogs by stating that even the family dog gets to eat food that is dropped (purposely or otherwise) from the table. Surprisingly, rather than be insulted, the woman accepted her place outside of God’s promises to Israel, but she also recognized the fact that there is plenty of God’s love and provision left over, even after God has fulfilled His promises to Israel. Carla Works says, “Her statement is striking. She places hope in what others have discarded. This Son of David has so much power that there is enough power for the house of Israel and more than enough left over for her. She is not trying to thwart his mission. She just wants a crumb, recognizing that even a crumb is powerful enough to defeat the demon that has possessed her daughter.” [4] And after she said this, Jesus praised the woman for her great faith, and He tells her that He has just healed her daughter.
And in looking at these two stories side by side, the one of the Pharisees and the one of the Canaanite woman, we can see how Jesus was using this contrast of clean vs. unclean to teach the disciples a lesson. By all accounts, this woman was unclean… a Gentile, an enemy of Israel, not an heir of God’s promises to Israel, and yet she recognizes Jesus as messiah, she is respectful and reverent, she believes that Jesus can heal her daughter, and she is humble; not at all put off by Jesus insultingly calling her a dog. In short, she shows exactly the kind of gentle and faithful spirit that comes from a heart that is aligned with God’s heart. Here, she becomes a contrast to the Pharisees, who though they were ostentatiously clean, were obsessed with appearances and were not actually living their faith.
The disciples were ready for Jesus to tell this woman to take a hike. They were annoyed by her persistence and her plaintive approach and just wanted her gone. Jesus needed to show the disciples that the Pharisees who were ritually “clean” were actually far from the kingdom of God, and that this woman who was an outsider, unclean, and the child of enemies of Israel, was exactly the kind of person that God is looking for. And so, Jesus saw and responded to her great faith. And sent a message to the disciples… and to us, that what appears to be “clean” isn’t always… and what appears to be unclean, may be exactly the person whose heart looks like God’s heart.
Scott Hoezee says, “Matthew wants us to see that even though we may think we know exactly what (and who) needs to come first in our ministries, the main thing is to remain open to the people God sends our way. We, too, may think that when it comes to “first things first,” taking care of in-house folks has a higher profile than reaching out to the community. But if we, like the Lord Jesus, are going to be open to God’s Spirit, then we need to be willing to change everything if that’s what it takes to be loving toward everyone we meet.” [5]
And so, in today’s lesson we need to get past the appearances of Jesus being rude or dismissive to our Canaanite friend and we need to understand the fact that she has helped Jesus teach the lesson that in God’s kingdom appearances count for nothing, and that those who are called by God are those who have allowed Him to create within themselves a heart that looks like God’s heart.
Who are we turning away from today? Who are we assuming to be unclean? Or unworthy? Who are the inhabitants of Paganland that God is sending our way? If God didn’t send His Son to condemn the world, and if we are called to be Christ-like, then we are not being sent to condemn the world either. But instead, we are being sent so that the world should be saved by Jesus… through us. That idea of God working miracles through us has been a common theme over the last few weeks. And so, my dear friends, let us let God work those miracles through us! Let us always be gracious. Let us not be fooled by appearances but let us accept with love all who God puts in our path. Let us allow God’s miracles to work through us as we work to bring the Gospel to the ends of the earth.
[1] Stanley P. Saunders, Preaching the Gospel of Matthew: Proclaiming God’s Presence, Pg. 135
[2] Scott Hoezee, CEPreaching.org, Commentary on Matthew 15:10-20, 21-28
[3] Allan Bevere, PreachersLectionaryNotebook.substack.com, From Clean Hands to Clean Hearts
[4] Carla Works, WorkingPreacher.org, Commentary on Matthew 15:10-20, 21-28-5
[5] Scott Hoezee, CEPreaching.org, Commentary on Matthew 15:10-20, 21-28