d Kunst vom Reedeřečnická figuraزیباشناسی سخن یا دانش شیوا بیانیмистецтво якісного висловлювання думок з метою переконання та впливу на аудиторіюகலை பற்றிய கருத்துpuhetaitoa szép beszéd, a nyilvános megszólalás tudományadie kuns en studie van die aanwending van taal met oortuigende effekArte da elocuenciaSining ng pananalumpativeenmise kunst文彩だけでなく、説得の技術全般art of persuasion, one of the three ancient arts of discourseالبلوغ إلى الغاية بقصرٍ وإيجاز لفظاً، وبالاستعارة والتشبيه وغيرها معنوياًarte de persuadirl'art de persuadirискусство речиläran om talekonstenکسی کو راغِب کرنے کا ایک ہنرart de l'éloquenceumiejętność oraz teoria pięknego i przekonującego wysławiania sięetkileyici ve ikna edici konuşma sanatıilmu tentang seni dalam berbicaraKunst der Beredsamkeitarte do discursoarte del persuadere con la parolaredenaarskunstnghệ thuật thuyết phục hay thuật hùng biệnאומנות שיכנוע באמצעות שפה설득을 위해 문장과 언어의 용법, 특히 대중 연설의 기술을 연구하는 학문The Art or Crafte of RhetorykeA booke called the Foundacion of Rhetorikeyesthose termsdecreased in explicit coveragein a new way which offers context of practical argumentsThe way the Sciences and the Humanities study the phenomena that surround us differ greatly in the amount of researcher personality allowed to influence the results of the study. For example, in the Sciences researchers purposefully adhere to a method .... Generally speaking, the researcher's personality, likes and dislikes, and religious and political preferences are supposed to be as far removed as possible from the actual study....
In sharp contrast, criticism actively involves the personality of the researcher. The very choices of what to study, and how and why to study a rhetorical artifact are heavily influenced by the personal qualities of the researcher.... In the Humanities, methods of research may also take many forms—criticism, ethnography, for example—but the personality of the researcher is an integral component of the study. Further personalizing criticism, we find that rhetorical critics use a variety of means when examining a particular rhetorical artifact, with some critics even developing their own unique perspective to better examine a rhetorical artifact.a broad methodan objective theoryThese typesSeptember 2023coverage of what by whom? explicit how?which dichotomy is that?which ideas?Are "those terms" the same as "the concepts" or something different?"these" isn't appropriate as this is the first mention of "types" in the sectionthis source is a blog post by some guy with a website; has its categorization been more widely influential?what's "a broad method"?which concepts are these? those in the text or some other set?what does that mean?which sources? what kind of things are "sources"?Jim A. KuypersRainolde , Richardyesyesno2561226056yes